As the UK automotive season winds down with the arrival of winter, the first event you plan to attend in the new season feels like a beacon of hope. This was especially true for many enthusiasts in England looking forward to January 2025’s Bicester Scramble. However, just the day before the event, weather warnings were […]
The post Bicester Scramble In The Snow appeared first on Speedhunters.
Yet there it was: Daniel Arsham’s Blue Calcite Eroded Porsche 911 sculpture. Known for his ‘future relics’, the New York-based artist had created a vision of time and decay, cast in fibreglass, steel, and minerals. At first glance, the 1980 Porsche 911 SCs unmistakable lines are all there. But then, you notice Arsham’s signature touches. Sections of […]
The post Daniel Arsham’s Eroded Porsche 911: A Petrolhead’s Encounter With Art appeared first on Speedhunters.
My dream collection wouldn’t be complete without a Lamborghini Miura SV, a Mercedes-Benz SL70 AMG and an Alpina B12 Coupé. I’d also have a Mercedes-AMG S65 as a daily and a Ferrari Enzo to abuse on track. Though I think the most achievable ‘dream’ V12 of mine is an older Aston Martin DBS, in black, […]
The post 5+7 = V12: A Custom BMW Super Saloon appeared first on Speedhunters.
It’s mind-boggling to me that 24 months have already passed. However, the fact that my youngest is approaching three and constantly tries to have full-blown conversations with me confirms it. So, what about Rough, the ER34 Nissan Skyline GT-T? Is the project still a project? Do I still even have it? The latter question doesn’t need to be addressed […]
The post Project Rough: The Mega Update appeared first on Speedhunters.
Probably the most famous – or most documented, at least – is Takeshi Moroi’s Porsche 962C featured by Dino back in 2012. Decades earlier, this would’ve been thundering down the Mulsanne Straight at over 200mph. However, seeing it parked in front of a Tokyo Family Mart is somehow even more impressive. If you prefer your […]
The post Cruisin’ Tokyo In The World’s Only Road-Legal Diablo GT2 appeared first on Speedhunters.
Spare time has been a limiting factor, but being able to use one car while work continued with the other was a priority. My Subaru Impreza WRX STI Spec C hasn’t had much in the way of fixes and upgrades, and this was intentional; I didn’t need two car-sized paperweights. Keeping the car mobile and […]
The post Projects Levin & Spec C: Teamwork Makes The Dream Work appeared first on Speedhunters.
Not just Germany but the whole world, for that matter. I don’t think that’s up for debate either, no matter how many cubic inches you like under the hood or how many waifu pillows you have in your bed. It’s an opinion I’ve maintained for years, but it was really cemented during my visit to the […]
The post Exploring The Engineering Might Of Mercedes-Benz appeared first on Speedhunters.
There’s so much to love about hot rodders. The can-do-will-do, belt-it-until-it-breaks attitude they have towards building and racing cars, the sense of community that encourages the wild and ingenious, and of course, the badass names they give their creations. I recently met up with lifelong ‘rodder Kaoru Koshimizu to check out his Evolution Ray, a C1 Chevrolet […]
The post Evolution Ray: Kaoru Koshimizu’s Reimagined C1 Corvette appeared first on Speedhunters.
The Toyota AE86 is a perfect example of this; it’s many things to many people and, with the right changes, can become an incredibly capable machine despite its inherent shortcomings. While some owners stay true to the purist approach, preserving the original 4A-GE engine and associated running gear (guilty again), what if you never had […]
The post Start Where You Are: A Purpose-Built AE86 appeared first on Speedhunters.
The 1980s were an era of excess, where extravagant lifestyles led to equally outrageous cars. The race for the title of ‘world’s fastest car’ pushed the limits of engineering as the supercar market boomed. Porsche’s 959 and Ferrari’s F40 broke the 200mph barrier, while aftermarket beasts like RUF’s CTR Yellowbird and the Callaway Sledgehammer hit […]
The post BMW M8: The Ultimate Driving Machine That Never Was appeared first on Speedhunters.
The old 2 Series Gran Coupe was far from being one of the most exciting BMWs in the lineup. The “F74” picks up where the “F44” left off since it probably won’t wow you either....
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
The iX is considered the ugly duckling of BMW’s ever-growing SUV lineup. We genuinely think some people will have a change of heart now that the Life Cycle Impulse is officially out. The recently launched...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
Racing for BMW M Motorsport certainly has its perks. Before Valentino Rossi picks up his shiny new M4 CS, the bespoke coupe is publicly displayed at the BMW Welt in Munich. The car stands out...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
BMWBLOG is attending a press event in Barcelona, where BMW invited us to discover the new iX. Well, the electric SUV is relatively new since it has only received a Life Cycle Impulse rather than...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
BMW unveiled the iX facelift in late January and has already invited journalists to check it out. We’re in Barcelona to spend quality time with the electric SUV and discover its updates, inside and out....
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
Rolls-Royce’s first EV has only been around for a couple of years, but it’s already getting the Black Badge treatment. The hotter iteration eclipses all the gasoline-fueled models before it, packing more punch than the...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
If you want to spend around $100,000 on a fast two-door BMW, you are faced with a dilemma: do you get the full-fat M4 in base trim, or do you instead opt for the more...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
The first-ever BMW M3 electric is still two years away, but in the meantime, BMW is pushing forward with their testing processes. Prototypes of the ZA0 M3 EV can now be seen on the road...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
Neue Klasse ushers in a completely fresh design language for BMW. We’ve seen the two Vision concepts, which preview the iX3 due later this year and the i3 in 2026, respectively. Before the sedan arrives...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
The M1 needs no introduction. BMW’s sole supercar still captivates over 40 years after the last mid-engine coupe was assembled. Giorgetto Giugiaro’s stunning wedge-shaped machine is an exceptionally rare sight, with fewer than 500 vehicles...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
If you’re ingrained in the latest BMW developments, you may recall hearing about the “Heart of Joy,” BMW’s latest step forward in vehicle computing power. We’ve talked about what BMW’s Heart of Joy sets out...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
This may look like an M version of the Vision Neue Klasse concept, but it’s much more than that. Dubbed the BMW Vision Driving Experience (VDX), the prototype represents the first application of what the...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
BMW is hours away from unveiling the Vision Driving Experience prototype, but the proverbial cat is already out of the bag. Official images of the VDX have emerged on social media, showing the electric sports...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
The sinister-looking M70 isn’t the only flavor of the new iX displayed in Munich at the BMW Welt. This xDrive60 also shows several goodies the old xDrive50 didn’t have. For example, the electric luxobarge is...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
The BMW Welt reopened its doors a few days ago, following a five-week hiatus for renovation work. One of the first car handovers involved a model facing retirement. The X4 M and the regular X4...
First published by https://www.bmwblog.com
PV5 is targeting a relatively low starting price of €35k (equivalent to £29k)First in a line of 'Platform Beyond Vehicles' gets futuristic looks and MPV variant; more derivatives to come
The Kia PV5 has been unveiled as the brand’s first van, conceived as a futuristic rival to the Volkswagen ID Buzz.
The first in a new line of models dubbed Platform Beyond Vehicles (PBVs), it will be followed by a larger PV7 due in two years, aimed squarely at the venerable Ford Transit and Geely-owned brand Farizon's SV.
It has been developed from the ground-up as an electric van rather than using an adapted combustion-engine platform, as is the case with the Ford E-Transit Custom.
Technical details have yet to be confirmed, but the PV5 concept shown in 2024 used a modified version of the E-GMP platform that underpins a number of the brand’s electric SUVs. It mirrors the entry-level Kia EV3 in featuring a single front-mounted electric motor and electricals running at 400V, rather than the higher 800V used by the upmarket EV6 and EV9.
It’s therefore expected to offer the same 201bhp and 209lb ft motor as the EV3, which allows the crossover to dispatch the 0-62mph sprint in 7.6sec. Performance will undoubtedly differ in the van, however, especially once fully laden.
The EV3 is also offered with batteries measuring 58.3kWh and 81.4kWh, yielding 270 or 375 miles of range, respectively; this, also, would be limited in a larger and heavier van.
Although the PV5 has been unveiled in passenger and cargo van forms, Kia said that it will show yet more variants at its upcoming EV Day (on 27 February) event. The nature of the van’s skateboard-style EV platform means that it can effectively wear any ‘hat’ that Kia desires, and the concept was previously shown in both pick-up and rugged Volkswagen California-style camper van forms.
What should remain consistent between each variant is the front end, which remains true to the concept. Angular LED daytime running lights are positioned high on its rakish nose, while the main-beam headlights are set into the lower bumper.
The interior’s design has yet to be shown in full, but the exterior images released by Kia reveal split instrument and infotainment display screens – a key difference from the brand’s cars, which typically use a combined fascia.
The cargo area, meanwhile, is set to feature a novel rail system on its floor and ceiling to allow for items such as cabinets and seats to be added or removed with greater ease.
Kia has yet to announce how many people the PV5 will seat, but the similarly proportioned ID Buzz is offered in five-, six- and seven-seat configurations.
Such accessories will be offered as part of a wider PBV ecosystem, which will also comprise software solutions for jobs such as fleet management.
Kia previously said the PV5 would target a starting price of just €35,000 (£29,000) in Europe, suggesting it will open in the low-to-mid £30,000s in the UK.
The production van will make its debut here at the Commercial Vehicle show in Birmingham, which opens on 29 April. Deliveries are expected to begin around October.
Launch of more hardcore T50S clears the way for new bespoke commissionsNew division will focus on one-off models, plus highly-customised examples of the T50 and T33
The Gordon Murray Group has launched a new Special Vehicles division to accommodate demand for bespoke models.
The company said the new division will operate independently of Gordon Murray Automotive, with its own engineering staff.
Its cars will range from limited-edition variations of the T50 and T33 supercars to one-off productions built on a new platform.
It will also run a heritage operation whose remit will include building new examples of classic Murray-built models (presumably including the Light Car Company Rocket) to their original specifications.
In addition, it will build “reimagined” classics with modern specifications, implying a similar approach to Boreham Motor Works’ new Ford Escort RS.
Gordon Murray said his company has been inundated with demand for one-off versions of the T50 but “always resisted these requests” to focus on the launch of it and then the T33.
“Now, as we have grown the business and team, we have established separate design and engineering departments for [Gordon Murray Special Vehicles]," he continued. "It’s the perfect time to extend our offering to special vehicles.”
Murray added that the Special Vehicles division’s work exists "outside of the current GMA product and platform plan”.
Its first bespoke car is earmarked to be revealed this year.
The new division adds an important string to the group's bow as it looks to scale up production and establish itself as a luxury brand in the same breath as marques such as Bentley, Ferrari and Lamborghini.
Bespoke operations have been crucial profit-spinners for such brands in recent years. Indeed, Rolls-Royce recently announced that 2024 had been a record year for its customisation offering, claiming that the value of bespoke content in its cars increased by 10%. It has in turn invested £300 million in its Goodwood factory, of which a significant portion is devoted to improving its capacity for bespoke cars and coachbuilding.
New stack (pictured) will improve on the 128kW output of that in the current Toyota Mirai FCEVNew system, which will also be cheaper and more durable, is being readied for production from 2027
Toyota is working on a third-generation hydrogen fuel cell system that's claimed to bring double the power and 20% greater efficiency without any increase in size.
For reference, the stack used in the current Toyota Mirai FCEV puts out 128kW.
Toyota said the new system will be ready for launch in 2027 at the earliest.
It's primarily aimed at Japan’s heavy-duty commercial vehicle class, comprising machines such as diggers, but will also feature in passenger vehicles, suggesting that Toyota is readying a thirzd-generation Mirai for around the same time.
The company has sold around 28,000 examples of the hydrogen-fuelled saloon since the original model's introduction 11 years ago.
Toyota added that the new fuel cell system will be twice as durable as the current one, aiming for it to be on a par with its diesel combustion engines.
The fuel cell is also said to cost significantly less to produce, although Toyota has yet to detail exactly how that compares with that used in the existing Mirai.
Toyota has been the car industry’s most vocal proponent of hydrogen power in recent years, emphasising its lower weight compared with battery electrification – crucial for commercial vehicles – and the potential to offer longer range for operation in remote areas.
However, it told Autocar in 2023 that the Mirai had “not been successful”, citing the limitations imposed by the rarity of hydrogen filling stations. It said it was adjusting its hydrogen focus to commercial vehicles but ultimately remained committed to the fuel.
Thiebault Paquet, Toyota’s hydrogen boss in Europe, told Autocar last year that he believes the company “can rebuild the story” of the fuel by focusing on heavy-duty models. “Hydrogen will come; this is something we’re convinced about,” he said.
Toyota isn't alone in backing the alternative fuel, though. Hyundai, for instance, is working on a second iteration of its Nexo FCEV.
Speaking at Hyundai's investor day last year, president and CEO Jaehoon Chang described it as a “chicken-and-egg issue”, comparing the industry’s mood to that around early battery electric cars.
“The market requires investment,” Chang said. “Thirty years ago, when BEVs were launched, the same issues were mentioned: cost, where to charge and [whether it makes sense].”
Similarly, BMW plans to launch a range of hydrogen FCEVs, starting with a next-generation X5. These will use Toyota fuel cells rather than the company’s own designs, however.
New liveries were presented on demo carsBrash new event wasn't to traditionalist tastes but you have to admire the ongoing growth and diversification of F1
Formula 1’s inaugural season launch event last night was, perhaps unexpectedly, a resounding success.
In the past, we’ve had weeks of unremarkable individual team launches or even new cars simply being rolled out of the garage at the first pre-season test. But here, all 10 teams and 20 drivers were presented in loud-and-proud style to 15,000 fans and suits (probably more of the latter, to be honest) at the O2 Arena in London.
It was all high-value, modern, concert-style stage production: bright lights, deafening music, giant screens, even pyrotechnics. Very impressive too, with a giant central video-screen ‘box’ rising and falling to reveal and conceal each car in turn. Each team was given free rein within a seven-minute slot to present their new livery – not car, note, but livery – and drivers in whichever way they liked.
Some did a great job of it. Williams and Ferrari went heavy on their heritage, and the Visa Cash App Racing Bulls hired comedian Munya Chawawa to poke fun at their ever-changing name (although could they not just use one of their good old names instead?). Others were just a bit odd: Sauber’s ‘HUSTLE HARDER’ video would have been extremely cringeworthy even if they hadn’t been the slowest team last year, and Alpine wasted way too much time by getting F1’s title-theme composer to pretend to DJ dubstep while wearing a puffer jacket.
Red Bull’s admirable attempt to celebrate car culture, meanwhile, was overshadowed a bit by the crowd loudly booing Max Verstappen and Christian Horner – pretty excruciating to witness. Interestingly, they were two of only three boo victims on the night, the other being the FIA. Clearly, fans aren’t on board with the governing body’s heavy-handed swearing ban.
Comedian Jack Whitehall was the host – a masterstroke choice, embodying F1’s modern, fun and ‘chronically online’ image with his continuous fun-poking. Whitehall clearly is actually an F1 fan, or at the very least super-hot on his research, all of his jokes tapping into ‘the culture’. Some were pretty close to the line too, pleasingly: it’s not all stiflingly corporate. I do wonder how much super-serious Williams team principal James Vowles felt about being referred to as ‘Jimmy V the rizz master’, but the fans evidently loved it.
Many fans have criticised F1’s transformation over the past decade or so, from Bernie Ecclestone’s closed shop to an American-style sports-entertainment franchise. I have absolutely been one of them, having become interested in the sport in the days when even uploading highlights to YouTube was scorned by the bosses and nobody even knew what a meme was.
The ‘new F1’, or the ‘Netflix F1’, if you like, still sits uncomfortably with me – basically because I love watching non-league football and find the presentation of the Super Bowl sickeningly tacky. I struggle to watch the Miami and Las Vegas grands prix and worry for the future of hallowed places like Spa and Monza. But even I can’t help but admire the growth and diversification that F1 commercial rights holder Liberty Media has achieved, and this 2025 season launch event was a perfect example of that.
Any fast Renault is "gonna be a yellow car", de Meo saidPerformance-focused sub-brand was "put in the fridge" to make way for Alpine
The Renaultsport sub-brand could be revived, despite the Renault Group’s focus on Alpine for performance machinery, CEO Luca de Meo has said.
“Officially, the Renaultsport badge we put in the fridge, and everything sporty would be building on Alpine, but it doesn't mean that sometimes this thing wouldn’t be revived,” he told Autocar at the 2025 Formula 1 season launch in London last night.
“I’ve been asked why the new 3E Turbo is not an Alpine, and I said ‘sorry, because the 5 Turbo was never an Alpine, it was a Renault, and if you want to do something authentic, you gotta respect the history of the thing, so it’s gonna be a yellow car’. Of course, you can customise the product, but this is the thing. So I don't limit necessarily to Alpine.”
There hasn’t been a Renaultsport model since the fourth-generation Mégane RS went off sale in 2023.
What’s more, the former Renaultsport base at Dieppe was returned to Alpine ownership when the brand was relaunched with the A110 sports car in 2017.
Indeed, there is a great deal of continuity between the two divisions. For instance, Jean-Pascal Dauce, the project lead for the recently launched A110 R Ultime hardcore special, was the chief engineer of the iconic Mégane R26.R from 2008.
Meanwhile, Renault brand CEO Fabrice Cambolive previously told Autocar that while “speaking about Renaultsport without any products is not essential”, his team will “see what we can do” if the electric hot hatch is a success, adding: “Let’s build our ‘sportivity’ step by step.”
Interestingly, the Renault 5 Turbo 3E is listed on the sponsors roster of the Alpine Formula 1 team, with branding set to appear on the wing mirrors of the 2025 race car.
The rate at which Chinese cars are improving is unprecedented.
Twenty-five years ago, China was knocking out models like the Lubao CA6410 – essentially the front end of an Austin Montego mated with the rear end of an Austin Maestro and a Toyota engine.
But today, via decades of economic growth, a few copycat creations and concentrating firmly on electric cars, Chinese models are up there with the best in the business.
They tend to be among the cheapest cars on the market - but don't don’t think it’s all price-driven pragmatism. They’re catching up with European, Japanese and Korean efforts in terms of interior quality and driving fun too.
We currently peg the Xpeng G6 as the best Chinese car on sale in the UK. It really is a credible Tesla Model Y rival, with an upmarket interior, decent ride quality and a price advantage over the American EV.
Below you will find our favourite cars from Chinese companies.
I’m quite a patriotic person, the type who will watch any sporting engagement whatsoever with an English representative.
That also translates into the automotive sphere, which is why I have such a deep-seated affinity for Land Rover.
I especially appreciate the earliest examples for their unassuming badassery. Take the Series 1: it may look rudimentary by today’s standards, but its compact proportions and innovative four-wheel drive system mean it can tackle unforgiving terrain as capably as a new hatchback handles the M25.
Plus, there’s undeniably a certain beauty in its raw, function-over-form design. And yes, it’s objectively terrible to drive, and the cabin has all the suppleness of a park bench, but you can’t have it all.
This boxy aluminium workhorse was the genesis for everything that Land Rover has put its name to over the past 77 years, including the Range Rover, the Discovery and the mega-popular modern Defender to which it serves as an indirect forefather.
Most poignantly to me, though (and perhaps uniquely), the expansion of the Land Rover family would ultimately lead us to the oft-overlooked Freelander.
I first fell for Landies when I was around 10 years old. My mum had this beautiful dark green Mk1 Freelander as our family runaround. I couldn’t tell you the engine or the spec, but I remember just being completely and utterly in love with it.
This was back when do-it-all family crossovers could still exude real kerb appeal and genuine charisma, and to a car-mad kid, its chunky, purposeful proportions were bang on. The side-hinged boot with its lowering rear window still feels novel and fun even two decades later, too.
Sadly, it went after a few years, replaced by a comparatively humdrum Chrysler Voyager after one too many wallet-busting repair jobs.
At the time, I didn’t understand the decision: why swap from a lovely British 4x4 to a drab, amorphous American people carrier? The Freelander’s well-documented reliability issues didn’t really register on my juvenile radar.
But that wasn’t the end of my family’s Land Rover story: fast forward just a few years and I was waiting for a lift after school when around the corner hummed a P38A-generation Range Rover, and behind the wheel of this regal runaround, much to my surprise, was my dad, looking a bit miffed.
He had been forced to buy it after my mum discovered eBay and wanted something with a towbar.
I couldn’t understand how a man so cosily enveloped in such a sumptuous, full-brown leather interior could look so miserable. Until I clocked that it was leaning quite obviously to one side and was powered by the notorious 4.0-litre petrol V8. Poor man.
But the Rangie’s quirks – even its failed air suspension (which never got fixed) and low-double-digit MPG figures – just made me love it even more.
Even though it shared space with an MGF, that 4x4 was the best thing we ever had on the driveway.
On this week's My Week In Cars podcast Steve Cropley and Matt Prior talk about the new Subaru Forester and a reader's 2001 Fiat Bravo on a road trip in New Zealand.
Plus, Prior overturns a parking fine, and the pair talk about why the Polestar network needs to be expanded, and much more, including your correspondence.
Make sure you never miss an Autocar podcast. Subscribe to our podcasts via Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Podcasts or via your preferred podcast platform. And if you subscribe and rate and review the pod, we'd really appreciate that too.
The new Rolls-Royce Black Badge Spectre is the most powerful model in the West Sussex car maker’s history, packing up to 650bhp and 793lb ft.
Its arrival also takes the Black Badge moniker into the electric age for the first time. Launched in 2016, Black Badge branding is intended to denote powerful and more individualistic versions of its most luxurious cars and is targeted at younger buyers.
Arriving just over a year after the Spectre went on sale as the brand’s first electric car, the Black Badge model is pitched as a more aggressive proposition than the standard EV.
While the dual-motor Rolls-Royce Black Badge Spectre offers the same 577bhp as the standard car in normal running, a new Infinity mode unlocks a further 73bhp and quickens throttle response.
This performance-enhancing feature is said to be inspired by the Rolls Royce Merlin engine that powered aircraft such as the Supermarine Spitfire during the Second World War. It allowed pilots to call on an extra burst of power to escape dog fights.
As well as the Infinity mode (the symbol of Black Badge), Rolls-Royce has added a launch control setting called Spirited mode, which boosts torque from 660lb ft to 793lb ft and primes the car for a 0-62mph time of 4.1sec.
In all, the potent new Spectre model surpasses the output of the 2016 Wraith Black Badge, which made 623bhp and 642lb ft from its twin-turbocharged V12.
In sync with the extra reserves of the Black Badge Spectre, engineers have fitted new dampers to reduce the effects of the three-tonne EV squatting under acceleration and diving under braking. They also increase the roll stabilisation for flatter cornering. The car gets heavier steering too.
Rolls-Royce has introduced new levels of customisation with the Black Badge Spectre. One option enables buyers to fit the illuminated grille with a backplate that lights up in one of five colours.
This theme continues inside, where the treadplate can also be illuminated, this time in 10 different colourways. The cabin houses the same luxuries as the standard car, which combines an array of high-end materials with digital screens and physical buttons.
The Black Badge is also available with a new colour: Vapour Violet. This is said to be inspired by the “neon ambience of 1980s and 1990s club culture”. The new colour can be paired with a white bonnet for a “bold contrast”. Special new 23in fi ve-spoke alloy wheels are fitted and shod with Rolls-Royce’s noise-cancelling run-flat tyres.
“Black Badge Spectre is one of the clearest statements of power and purpose we have ever made,” said Rolls-Royce CEO Chris Brownridge. “Our engineers crafted an intense and uncompromising character and the most powerful Rolls-Royce in history.”
The company has not disclosed pricing, but with the standard car costing from £332,055 before options, it is likely that transaction prices for the Black Badge Spectre will creep well beyond the £500,000 mark once cars are equipped to customers’ specifications.
New grille mirrors that fitted to the XC90Brand’s best-selling SUV gets a further update ahead of the arrival of its electric sibling, the EX60
The Volvo XC60 has been updated with a new look and upgraded interior in a bid to maintain the appeal of the brand's best-selling model.
Visual changes include a new grille similar to that fitted to the new XC90, as well as darker rear lights. There will also be new wheel designs, although UK specifications have yet to be confirmed.
Inside, the car gets a larger, 11.2in infotainment touchscreen that is now elevated above the dashboard’s surface.
It runs via a more powerful chip from American firm Qualcomm, which is said to make the system twice as quick to respond to inputs as before. It also brings crisper graphics, according to Volvo.
The new XC60 is said to get more luxurious materials inside, with upholstery options including a combination of Nordico synthetic leather and herringbone-pattern fabric. Cabin refinement is said to be improved too.
Powertrains are unchanged, meaning there is a choice of a 248bhp mild hybrid or two plug-in hybrids with outputs of 345bhp and 449bhp.
Cars with coil-sprung suspension will receive new dampers intended to soften their ride, although the air suspension set-up remains unchanged.
Prices are set to be confirmed next month but are expected to rise slightly compared with the outgoing version of the XC60, which is priced from £46,115. Deliveries will begin in the third quarter, between July and the end of September.
That the petrol-powered XC60 has received an update so close to the release of its electric counterpart, the EX60 (due next year), suggests it will remain on sale for the foreseeable future.
Indeed, Volvo boss Jim Rowan has previously suggested that the larger XC90 could remain on sale into the next decade, depending on demand for the model relative to its EX90 sibling.
“We will be ready to go fully electric this decade, but if the market infrastructure and customer acceptance is not quite there, we can allow that to take a few more years,” he said. “The transition to electrification will not be linear. Customers and markets are moving at different speeds, and therefore we will continue to invest in our hybrids so that wherever you are in your journey to electric driving, you can have a Volvo to suit your needs and your situations.”
The 2025 Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas flagged up how radical car interiors might become – and sooner rather than later.
Continental showed its Emotional Cockpit concept, which combines high-tech electronics with displays framed by Swarovski crystal, a high-quality cut glass from Austrian firm Swarovski Mobility.
A floating 12.3 TFT display beneath the centre of the dash is set beneath a transparent crystal surface and forms the control element for both driver and front passenger.
The TFT technology has full-array local dimming technology (FALD), which controls the backlighting. FALD is used in LED TVs and divides the LED backlights into zones that can be dimmed in certain areas (hence ‘local’).
LEDs in the brighter areas can be turned up and those in darker areas turned down to create a more vivid image.
In the dashboard itself, there’s a small ‘Widget Crystal’, described as an interaction surface for an AI assistant and interactive widgets that give information on things like weather and location.
The 3.5in Widget Crystal is powered by advanced micro-LED technology, which is super-intense but has yet to find its way into mainstream domestic TVs because of the huge cost.
The crystal casings of the displays are designed to create the impression of an image floating inside them and Continental believes there’s a strong business case for this.
According to its user experience team, end users and car makers are both placing greater importance on the emotional attachment owners have to a car.
With that theme in mind, Continental has also revealed its E Ink display, which substitutes ePaper technology for backlit LED displays. Essentially, ePaper is the kind of thing used by Kindle and other tablet readers to get closer to the look of a printed page.
In this case, the technology has been developed by specialist firm E Ink. Here, it is used for a 1.3m-wide, 4cm-tall E Ink prism display that spans the width of the dashboard. Initial prototypes are black and white but the plan is to introduce full colour.
The display is intended to visually enhance the vehicle interior, enable personalisation and provide essential information for driving the car.
The display shown at CES consumes small amounts of power only when switching from one image to the next.
Like its e-reader counterparts, the display doesn’t rely on backlighting like LED screens but instead reflects light like paper.
Because of that, it can display images, graphics and text permanently without consuming any power, although that suggests in low light or darkness some illumination will be needed.
Removable disc in the battery casing allows water to reach the cells in the event of a fireFireman Access device is said to allow an EV fire to be extinguished in the same time as an ICE vehicle
The Renault Group has developed a fire suppression system for electric cars that promises to drastically reduce the time and water needed to extinguish blazes – and it is now opening it up to other vehicle manufacturers.
The Fireman Access system – fitted to all electric and plug-in hybrid Renault Group models – is said to allow electric vehicle fires to be extinguished "in roughly the same time as on a combustion vehicle".
It takes the form of an adhesive disc that is placed over an opening in the vehicle's battery and is designed to dislodge under the pressure of a fire hose, which allows water to quickly spread to all the cells inside - "the only fast and effective way of stopping thermal runaway", according to Renault.
The company says this allows an electric vehicle battery fire to be extinguished in a matter of minutes, compared with several hours using current methods. It also uses 10 times less water.
Having rolled out the Fireman Access system to its current electric and PHEV models, the Renault Group is making the patents freely available via free licence to the wider automotive industry so other companies can use it themselves.
Electric vehicles are less likely to catch fire than combustion vehicles, but the fires are much more difficult to put out because a chemical blaze does not require oxygen, making suffocation ineffective and greatly increasing the amount of water needed to extinguish the flames.
A battery fire also releases toxic gases and can reignite without warning even after it has been extinguished – meaning burned-out EVs must be stored far away from other vehicles and buildings.
Renault Group CEO Luca de Meo said: “Innovating to improve road safety is part of who we are at Renault. We're particularly proud of the partnership developed with the fire services in recent years. Fireman Access is a practical demonstration of what can be achieved by combining our expertise as a manufacturer with the skills of the men and women who keep us safe every day.
"Today, I'm delighted to be making this innovation freely available, because when it comes to a subject like safety, we need to break down all the barriers. This move is also in keeping with the commitment made alongside the United Nations to make mobility safer, all over the world."
The Supreme Court has blocked chancellor Rachel Reeves from intervening in the landmark car finance case that is thought to have affected millions of buyers.
The case is set to be heard by the UK's highest court in April and is centred around non-discretionary lender-paid dealer commissions that were tacked on to car finance deals without the knowledge of buyers.
In some instances, it has been judged that salespeople acting as brokers were incentivised to charge higher interest rates so they could bank an increased commission.
The Supreme Court is hearing the case after the Court of Appeal ruled compensation should be paid by lenders where buyers were not informed about the commission.
The government last month said that while it wanted customers to get any compensation they were owed, the size of any redress bill was concerning, especially as it could heavily impact UK banks.
However, the chancellor’s attempt to intervene in the case has been blocked by the court.
A spokesperson for the Treasury told the BBC: "We respect the court's decision to not grant our application to intervene... and will monitor it closely".
WHAT HAS HAPPENED?The ruling by the Court of Appeal was announced as part of a case brought against Close Brothers and Firstrand Bank by three customers who claimed they were mis-sold finance deals. The trio had previously had their cases thrown out by lower courts.
Judges unanimously ruled to uphold their appeals, stating that “a broker could not lawfully receive a commission from a lender without obtaining the customer’s fully informed consent to the payment”.
This effectively bans dealers from profiting on finance deals unless the buyer gives their consent. The decision threw banks and dealers into a state of disarray and the situation has been called the biggest finance scandal since PPI in the middle of the last decade
The case is now being heard by the Supreme Court after lenders appealed the decision.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?The ruling effectively threatens the long-established agreement that dealers receive commissions from banks or lenders for acting as a middleman in selling finance agreements on vehicles.
Since the ruling, many car makers have already begun to disclose commission rates to customers in order to continue business as normal.
Among those gearing up for the worst is Lloyds Bank, as the owner of Black Horse, a leading lender of car finance. In February, it revealed it had set aside £450 million to cover legal expenses and compensation payouts.
It follows an investigation earlier in 2024 by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concerning discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) sold between 2007 and 2020, after more than 10,000 complaints were made.
DCAs allowed dealers and brokers to adjust lenders’ interest rates to reward themselves with commission payments on hire purchase (HP) and personal contract purchase (PCP) deals.
In one complaint, the FCA stated, Black Horse was found to have allowed a dealer to set an interest rate of between 2.49% and 5.5%, with anything over 2.49% being paid to the dealer as commission. The dealer charged the highest rate of 5.5%, amounting to half of the customer’s total interest bill on the loan. In addition, the dealer didn't tell the customer it had set the interest rate or how much commission it had earned.
Fiat will launch all-new versions of the 500 and Panda as the foundations for a dramatically expanded range that will enable the Italian brand to break out from its recent history as a small car specialist and into larger vehicles over the next five years.
After spending much of the past decade in the doldrums as safety legislation gradually eroded its ageing model range in Europe, Fiat now has a whole host of new models in the works.
The company now has the architectures on which to build new models thanks to the scale offered by being part of the Stellantis group.
In addition, two larger C-segment models, previewed by 2024 concept cars, will join the all-new electric and hybrid versions of the 500 and Panda as well as the recent range additions of the 600 and the Grande Panda. All of these new models have been confirmed for production.
All-new Panda and 500The Panda and 500 have done the bulk of the heavy lifting for Fiat over most of this century in Europe. But both cars have been allowed to grow old on ageing architectures.
Last year, time was finally called on the 500 Hybrid – as it became known, to differentiate it from the all-electric, mechanically unrelated 500e that was launched in 2020.
The current Panda, now nicknamed ‘Pandina’ by Fiat internally, lives on in some markets and will continue to do so until 2030 courtesy of ongoing updates that will keep it as fresh as possible.
However, replacements for both cars are confirmed and they will each be launched in mild-hybrid and all-electric forms on what is now known as Stellantis’s STLA City architecture.
This was originally launched on the 500e as an EV-only architecture but it is now being reworked to accommodate mild-hybrid drivetrains as well. The 500 Hybrid will return at the end of this year underpinned by this architecture and built alongside the electric model at Fiat’s Mirafiori plant in Italy.
Both electric and hybrid versions of the 500 will be replaced in 2029 and again built in Mirafiori. In 2030, a replacement for the Panda will follow, also with both powertrain options but built at the Pomigliano plant in Italy. STLA City will therefore underpin two Fiat models, each with two different powertrain options, across two factories.
The design of the new 500 will be evolutionary but there will be a bigger change for the Panda, Fiat CEO Olivier François confirmed to Autocar.
“I expect the design of the replacement [Panda] to be a bit closer to the original Panda of the ’80s,” he said. This would also link it more closely with the new Grande Panda. “When you see them next to each other, you will see mama bear and baby bear. It will be really cute. It won’t just be a smaller version of the Grande Panda but it will have visual links, the same roots and the iconic silhouette,” he added.
They will be the last models launched at the end of a product offensive that follows the demise of much of Fiat’s existing range. François said it was “painful” to “have to stop big names” with the likes of the 500X, Tipo and 500 Hybrid retiring due to GSR2 safety regulations that came into force last summer.
“Things were tough but we have come through,” said François.
Fiat goes bigOn the eve of the Geneva motor show in February last year, Fiat revealed five new concept cars that preview the expansion of its model range.
Of the five, the City Car concept has become the Grande Panda, while the Pick-up concept previews a replacement for its bestselling global pick-up truck, the Strada. A camper van was also shown.
Of most relevance to Fiat in Europe are the SUV and Fastback concepts, both of which preview new models that are due to be launched by 2027. They are fashioned in the same style as the Grande Panda and are considered part of an extended Panda family. However, they they won’t use the Panda name in production and won’t simply be scaled-up versions of the Grande Panda.
The two new models will be built on the same Smart Car platform as the Grande Panda to facilitate significant cost advantages over rivals. Both hybrid and electric versions are expected to be offered.
The SUV will be a direct rival to the Dacia Bigster and has the best potential for success in Europe.
The production Fastback is an indirect successor to the Tipo as a raised Volkswagen Golf-sized hatchback and is expected by Fiat to do well in global markets - but Europe will still be a focus for the car, given its huge lift in visual appeal over the Tipo.
François said no Fiat will be longer than 4.5m as a “self-limiting” rule imposed by the brand to avoid overlapping with other Stellantis marques, most notably Citroën. “When we go into the C-segment, we will have a totally different attitude that sits right: not better, not worse, but our Italian smile and with our colours on,” he said.
Within Stellantis, François said that even at a global executive level it is asked “if we need all these brands, and all these models for all these brands”. But “we need things to complement each other and we need to complete the puzzle and occupy every space”.
He said that Fiat’s planned move into the lower end of the C-segment is complementary, but were it to go larger and make a car the size of the Citroën C5 Aircross, that would give Stellantis “good synergies” with shared architectures but “poor complements” because the cars would rival each other.
Punto in the wingsFrançois said one of the first things he did when he took over as Fiat CEO in 2011 was to cancel a planned successor to the Punto. “It was okay-looking but not super-iconic,” he said, adding that it only really had a chance of success in Europe, not in Fiat’s other global markets such as South America and Africa.
Instead, he wanted a “car that could be global” and do “huge volumes” and it was utility vehicles and not superminis that had global appeal. Hence the creation of the Grande Panda, a type of raised hatchback/shrunken SUV that had been in François’s head since he cancelled the Punto. But it took the arrival of François Leboine from Renault/Dacia in 2021 to realise the design.
That car became the Grande Panda but François has left the door ajar for a future model more akin to the Punto, should the push for greater efficiency in EVs result in the SUV trend giving way to one where lower hatchbacks thrive again due to their better aerodynamic performance.
François said: “If Punto was very sleek and sporty, it would be hugely linked to the future of electrification.”
Such a car is not planned by Fiat at the moment, but François is ready to respond to any market shift.
Felicita. The Italian word for happiness was plastered all over the launch event for the new Fiat Grande Panda, and it was certainly emanating from CEO Olivier François, who, after years of axing ageing models and not launching new ones, has a plan we can all get behind.
“Happiness is a byproduct of having purpose,” he said. “The auto world is complicated but can we not face the future with a smile?”
Even as Fiat shrank to become effectively the 500 car company in Europe, it has remained Stellantis’s largest brand globally. It is big in Latin America, the Middle East and Africa and has retained a large global manufacturing footprint.
“Being global is the only way to be strong and resilient,” said François. So while Fiat has seen its model range gutted in Europe by GSR2 regulations, Latin America in particular has “kept Fiat alive” by never “having platforms jeopardised by regulations”.
François said Fiat “does not have a brand problem but an offer problem” with its cars. Not being in the B-segment “has crippled” Fiat in Europe.
Despite having no new cars to talk about, the way Fiat has continued to present itself is as impressive as any car maker in any segment. “The 500 Hybrid that died [in 2024] was a 17-year-old car,” said François, but “no one noticed”, due to the quality of Fiat’s marketing and ability to keep the 500 fresh.
Perhaps that’s no surprise as François is a marketer and has another day job as Stellantis’s global chief marketing officer. A resident of Miami with a pop star wife, François delivered Bruce Springsteen for a Jeep Super Bowl commercial in 2021 and called up his old mate Shaggy to do the ad for the new Grande Panda.
Yet the products needed to change and the way out of Fiat’s malaise is with Stellantis’s Smart Car platform, a global low-cost modular architecture inspired by Dacia. It can yield cars that appeal to all of Fiat’s global markets and can be built everywhere too.
The platform was the baby of ex-Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares, yet he had “a lot of pushback in the company”, according to François, as no brand “desperately needed it”, given Stellantis had more sophisticated modular architectures and no need to make and sell truly low-cost cars in far-flung places.
Enter Fiat. “We were starving for love. We’d take anything,” said François. “Carlos loved our love for his platform, but his vision was to take a Citroën [C3] and make a Fiat. We needed it to be a blockbuster for our company. We introduced some diversity and complexity, but promised something special. He bought it. I told him we would do much more with the Smart Car.”
The Grande Panda is the first Smart Car Fiat and there are plenty more to come. Ultimately, François said that however painful it’s been to axe model after model, it has done the company “the power of good” to reset itself and come back stronger.
What am I, Autocar's supermini correspondent? I'd be quite happy with that, actually, having previously run a generally fabulous Renault Clio E-Tech hybrid and then an endearingly honest petrol Dacia Sandero on our test fleet.
Now I'm trying the new MG 3 - a car on which I delivered Autocar's first verdict back in May, and a very positive verdict at that. Well, MG did promise "everything about it was designed to put a smile on your face".
The old 3 seemed a generation behind the competition even when I last drove it some six years ago, the justification being that it was one of the cheapest cars on sale. This new 3 is a wholly different proposition:
MG says it effectively skipped a generation, which checks out, and it's now priced £4000 higher, putting it into Clio territory. And in terms of how it behaved on the road, my initial feeling was that it wasn't notably inferior to the class leader.
Of course, though, living with a car every day can reveal hidden talents and flaws, which is why I will now be evaluating the 3 over an extended period.
Like that initial test car, my 3 is in Trophy trim, which adds extra advanced driver assistance systems (as required by regulators, unfortunately), LED headlights, a combination of faux-leather and fabric upholstery, heated front seats (yes then!), a heated steering wheel (oh, get in!), a 360deg camera, keyless ignition and automatic windscreen wipers.
That's all on top of SE trim's generous standard kit count, which includes a 10.3in touchscreen infotainment system with Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and sat-nav, a 7.0in digital instrument display, a six-way adjustable driver's seat, rear parking sensors, electrically adjustable door mirrors and 16in alloy wheels.
It's an almost identical spec to the entry-level Clio hybrid yet for £3500 less (although they are almost identical on a 48-month PCP finance deal at present, costing around £200 per month).
It really is amazing how much you get on affordable cars nowadays (and I would argue that an £18,495 starting price definitely still qualifies the 3 as such).
The extra-cost item on our car is the rather smart metallic silver paint, because MG simply doesn’t do options: you just pick a powertrain, one of two trim levels and a colour. Actually, in the 3’s case, you don’t even pick a powertrain, because it only comes as a hybrid (for now, at least; a cheaper pure-petrol model is apparently on the way).
This combines a naturally aspirated 1.5-litre four-pot petrol engine, a three-speed automatic gearbox, an electric motor and a small (0.92kWh usable capacity) battery. Combined outputs are put at 192bhp and 313lb ft, or in electric-only running there’s 134bhp and 184lb ft – significantly more than some perfectly usable EVs have.
I’m still unconvinced about the accuracy of that combined torque claim, even though the 3 can kick me up the backside with what is for a supermini hilarious strength.
It’s something I need to look into in greater detail. Certainly, the gearbox, while simpler than the mind-boggling multimodal unit in the Clio, isn’t what you would usually find, having so few speeds. It provides distinct waves of power delivery (one of them coming, confusingly and unhelpfully, at around 70mph), so perhaps the answer is somewhere therein.
In these tough economic times, the outstanding efficiency of the Clio was one of my favourite things about it, as it averaged 53.5mpg during our time together, against an official 65.7mpg. Given that the 3’s WLTP figure is a similar 64.2mpg, I’m relishing the prospect of still having some extra money left at the end of each month.
Everybody who has had a poke around this Trophy-spec interior has been impressed by the classy look and decent-quality feel – especially those with experience of the old 3.
I particularly like that, unlike in most Chinese cars (and, to be fair, many of the latest from other parts of the world), the touchscreen hasn’t absorbed all of the physical controls. In fact, it’s much more understated than most, including the Clio’s. Beneath said screen is a row of buttons for air-con functions, the infotainment system’s home page and the audio volume.
It’s just a shame that none of them is for adjusting the fan speed or internal heat, or indeed turning the heated surfaces on or off, and that you have to press the home button before the air-con button when Apple CarPlay is active (which itself irritates by requiring a wired connection), otherwise nothing happens. Oh well: you have to take what you can get these days.
A bigger disappointment is that the passenger’s seat doesn’t adjust for base height, only for angle and leg room, because it means either a 5ft-nothing or a 6ft-something passenger will always be in a suboptimal position (which wasn’t a problem in my high-spec Clio).
Similarly, it’s a shame that the 3’s rear bench doesn’t split in any way for folding – something I’ve always taken for granted – in order that I can take more than one person with me to Ikea.
Nevertheless, I’m still finding more positives than negatives about this car at the moment. I’m just puzzled why I haven’t seen another one on the road yet, six months after launch, especially given that there’s a big MG dealership in town.
Update 2Oh no, oh no: I’ve only just got this car and already something has gone horribly wrong with it – and in rush hour on the M25, of all times and places.
I’m cruising in the MG 3 when it emits a beeping noise so loud that I jolt with shock. There’s no way any ADAS bong could be so loud, I think in a fluster – this has to be something far more serious than straying too close to a line. It literally sounds like a fire alarm. Yet when checking the instrument display, I see no warning.
BEEP! BEEP! BEEP!
Okay, I need to pull over. Stationary on the hard shoulder, I check the screens more closely for anything amiss, but still there’s nothing.
Tentatively I dive back into the torrent of fellow commuters, but sure enough, shortly afterwards I’m subjected to that same noise. I pull over at Cobham services to check the manual, and even Google, but to no avail.
Time to take drastic measures, I contemplate, and grab the noise-cancelling headphones from my work bag (vital equipment in a busy office).
Here I must point out that I’m neither melodramatic nor unusually averse to loud noises. In fact, I’m more often blasting rock music than listening to Radio 4. No exaggeration, this alarm was uncomfortably, distractingly loud.
Naturally, I email MG the next day. Imminent mechanical crisis? No, they say: it’s the speed camera warning. Seriously. Unbelievable.
A week later, I again have trouble on this same stretch of motorway – ironically, due to a lack of an alarm noise. In lane four when the speed limit jumps from 40 to 70, I plant my right foot and nothing happens.
****! People are flashing, tailgating, undertaking... Miraculously I dodge and glide over to the hard shoulder, where I find I’ve run out of fuel.
Yes, ultimately my own stupid fault – but my previous Dacia Sandero would bing when illuminating its low-fuel light, which was itself prominent within the dial cluster, and neither of those things was true of the 3.
Once over the guard rail, I was dismayed to discover that the stairs up the embankment to a safer spot clearly hadn't been maintained in many years. I wouldn’t fancy climbing over and through big thorn bushes if I were disabled or elderly or had kids with me.
Then, after a very embarrassing rescue by the AA (the patrolman sold me a couple of cans of petrol via a contactless card machine), rejoining the traffic was extremely fraught, as I had reached the hard shoulder just a few hundred yards before it vanished and the 3’s hybrid powertrain had hugely limited its performance (while warning me of an ‘engine emissions fault’).
Probably the least auspicious start to something since Jaguar put in a bulk order for pink paint.
Update 3It seems that no two hybrid powertrains are the same anymore. There’s a real proliferation of ideas, and the Hybrid+ system that MG has introduced with its new 3 is one of the more interesting ones, having a gearbox of a kind unheard of since the 1990s and no fewer than four operating modes.
One, it can run purely on its 192bhp electric motor, up to around 35mph – and it can do this for longer than many other ‘self-charging’ hybrids, because its battery is considerably larger than its rivals’, at 1.8kWh, hence why it’s located between the rear wheels rather than under the passenger seat.
Two, it can run as a series hybrid, up to around 59mph – meaning the motor still does all of the driving but the 1.5-litre four-cylinder atmo petrol engine fires up to work as a generator for charging the battery.
Three, under strong acceleration, it can run as a parallel hybrid – meaning the motor and engine are both working to rotate the wheels.
And four, when you’re cruising at a steady speed, the engine can simultaneously do the driving and charge up the battery.
I’ve previously cast doubt over MG’s claimed combined torque figure of 313lb ft, because while the 3 is surprisingly fast, it doesn’t feel as torquey as a Volkswagen Golf R.
To my disappointment, MG hasn’t been able to provide a graph showing the car’s power and torque curves – although that’s perhaps understandable given how complex the powertrain’s operation is.
The amazing thing is that you can’t really sense which mode the powertrain’s computer brain has chosen: it just does its thing while you do yours.
Well, unless there’s no combustion noise, of course – and it isn’t a pleasant-sounding engine, especially when it’s firing up from cold. I wonder if it will sound better when not running on the hybrid-specialised Atkinson cycle in the promised pure-petrol manual 3.
I’m not convinced by MG’s choice of gearbox, though. Whereby I rate Toyota Yaris’s CVT and the Renault Clio’s clutchless multimodal ’box deliver power in a smooth, linear way, the 3 meets it out in distinct waves.
The third of these comes at around 70mph, which seems a bizarre point for MG to have chosen, as only Germans could ever (legally) benefit from that.
More pressingly, and something my passengers have really noticed, is the braking. Usually with a new car, your braking is jerky only for that first little while as you retrain your right-leg muscle memory, but with the 3 I still really struggle to decelerate smoothly. I suppose this must be an effect of its blending of friction and regen braking.
All this just adds credence to something a few colleagues have posited: MG’s ICE cars, while much better than they were a few years back, are a step behind its EVs in terms of operational sophistication.
Final updateRarely if ever have I been left with such mixed feelings about a long-term test car – and likewise, rarely have there been so many opinions expressed by colleagues and readers.
I was mightily impressed on our first drive of the second generation MG 3 supermini in April last year, awarding the car four stars on the basis that it “offers comfort, practicality, lots of technology and hybrid propulsion for several grand less than rivals” – and I still stand by that.
A couple of months later, though, our road testers knocked off half a star, declaring: “It still lacks the sophistication of some rivals and loses stars for its design compromises, poor tech and fuel economy that doesn’t quite live up to the promises” – and certainly some weaknesses in the car’s make-up became apparent to me during this extended time together. I don’t like unpleasant endings, so I will address the criticisms first.
Most of them were made clearer by this MG replacing a class-leading Renault Clio E-Tech hybrid in my parking spot. That “lacking sophistication”, then.
No, the 3 certainly isn’t as impressive to drive as the Clio. Its unorthodox Hybrid+ powertrain, with its three-speed automatic gearbox and four modes of operation, gave it an odd kind of performance, much more muscular at some speeds than others and with distinct waves of power, unlike the smooth and linear delivery that I had become used to (and that in my view is making purely combustion-engined models, even fancier ones, feel clunky to drive by comparison).
And although the softer springing and squidgier tyres of the 3 gave it a comfier ride than the firm and taut (at least in Esprit Alpine trim) Clio, I would still place more value on the much more spirited dynamics of the French car were my money at stake.
“Poor technology” seems a bit harsh, based on my experience. MG’s modestly sized touchscreen infotainment system and digital instrument cluster, while far from the most intuitive to operate, gave me everything I want from a car: Apple CarPlay (although only through a wire, annoyingly, and not perfectly integrated), DAB radio, sat-nav and a fuel economy readout.
And while the (now mandatory) ADAS features caused me some consternation, I’ve yet to drive a car in which they haven’t. I also didn’t recognise colleagues’ criticisms of the interior looking dull and feeling overtly cheap. For the money, I think MG did a good job on both fronts, if more the former than the latter.
What bothered me more was the evident cheapness of construction. I can’t recall testing a hatchback in which the rear seats didn’t split to fold down, and I was alarmed by how easy it was to detach the backrests out of their pivots when I automatically pushed them forward while holding only one of the two latches.
And the phone shelf (note: not an enclosed cubby) and cup-rest divider came free of their mounts more than once, leading colleagues to nervously (but thankfully incorrectly) tell me they had broken my car. Fuel economy was disappointing, too.
The WLTP lab boffins promised me 64.2mpg, but the 3 didn’t even manage 50mpg overall (aside from some shorter journeys). Admittedly my colleagues and I spent most of our time in the 3 haring up and down motorways, which is not what the average customer is going to be doing, but that was also true of the Clio, which managed 53.5mpg.
But, but, but. At a time when cars are all becoming fatter, higher-riding, more expensive and increasingly electric, the 3 must be celebrated as a traditional hatchback that is at once compact yet practical, spiritedly quick yet fairly efficient, diminutive yet comfortable and cheap yet not nasty.
I racked up long motorway journeys and never felt at the mercy of those outside-lane bullies, having all that petrol-electric power and torque under my right foot. I ran errands in town and was never made desperately uncomfortable over the endless deep potholes.
Four adults were happy to accept a li from me, and they didn’t even have to leave their luggage at home. So I’m convinced that for someone who buys their cars privately for local journeys and can’t charge an EV at home, the 3 could prove ideal.
Would I recommend the Clio instead? Absolutely. But would I talk you out of accepting a great deal offered by a local MG dealer? So long as you had your eyes wide open, I don’t think I would.
MG 3 Hybrid+ Trophy specificationPrices: List price new £20,275 List price now £20,495 Price as tested £20,820
Options: Monument Silver metallic paint £545
Fuel consumption and range: Claimed economy 64.2mpg Fuel tank 36 litres Test average 47.0mpg Test best 51.0mpg Test worst 41.3mpg Real-world range 372 miles
Tech highlights: 0-62mph 8.0sec Top speed 106mph Engine 4 cyls in line, 1498cc, petrol, plus electric motor Max power 192bhp Max torque 313lb ft Transmission 3-spd automatic, FWD Boot capacity 241-983 litres Wheels 6.5Jx16in, alloy Tyres 195/55 R16, Kumho Solus Kerb weight 1308kg
Service and running costs: Contract hire rate £273pcm CO2 100g/km Service costs None Other costs None Fuel costs £663.07 Running costs inc fuel £663.07 Cost per mile 13 pence Faults Touchscreen aircon glitch
The government will only allow new zero-emission cars to be sold from 2035 onwardsOur response to the UK government consultation on plans to ban the sale of new non-zero emission cars and vans
The chance to have your say on the future of motoring in the UK ends tomorrow (18 February), when the government closes responses for the consultation on the zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate.
Ever since 2020, when then prime minister Boris Johnson first outlined plans to ban the sale of new non-zero emission cars from 2030 onwards, there has been more confusion than clarity.
Under various subsequent UK governments, the date has moved from 2030 to 2035 and back, and all the while there has been a plan to allow the sale of certain hybrids – although nobody has yet specified exactly which sort. For car firms used to planning years in advance, it has been hugely problematic. For car buyers, this huge dollop of uncertainty has left many unsure what they should buy, or when.
But the current government has promised certainty, with a pledge to reinstate that 2030 date – and while some hybrids will be allowed on sale until 2035, there’s now finally a promise to specify details.
At the same time, the government is looking at refining some aspects of the ZEV mandate, which requires firms to sell an increasing percentage of EVs to avoid punitive fines. With the targets running ahead of consumer demand, it warped the market in 2024.
The first step to clarity is an ongoing government consultation, which seeks feedback on various aspects of the ICE phaseout and ZEV mandate. As we did with the original 2020 consultation (1 July 2020) Autocar feels it is vital to make our voice heard and we have submitted our own response.
We only answered the questions that only related to vans and commercial vehicles, or on other areas where we have no direct expertise. But here is our full response to all the questions that we addressed.
We've outlined how you can have your day at the bottom of this piece.
Part 1: 2030 phase out of new ICE cars, and CO2 requirements for vansQuestion 1: Do you agree with the Government’s view that full hybrid and plug-in hybrid technologies only should be considered? Please explain your answer.
Autocar supports the electrification of the UK car parc, both as a way of cutting emissions in our towns and cities and eliminating the CO2 output of cars and vans on UK roads. It is clear to us, and the wider car industry, that these are desirable outcomes. However, there are technologies other than HEV and PHEV that are also low or zero-emission capable at the tailpipe – such as hydrogen fuel cell, hydrogen combustion and synthetic e-fuels. While there are questions about the viability of such technologies, we would support a solution that encourages innovation in different energy sources that might prove viable long-term.
Question 2: Do you prefer a technological definition that permits both HEVs and PHEVs, or a technological definition that permits PHEVs only? Please explain your answer.
We would prefer a definition that sets standards, rather than enforcing specific solutions. For example, as the legislation is written at the moment range-extender electric vehicle technology that is rapidly taking off in China, a kind of halfway house between plug-in hybrids and full electric vehicles, is effectively banned in the UK before it even has a chance to launch. It should not be down to legislators to prescribe the solution to the problem, as has happened with a legislative path now that only leads to battery electric vehicles. While the goal may ultimately be zero emissions, to facilitate that the focus should be on reducing CO2 emissions and the more technologies that can contribute to that the better.
Question 3: Do you support no further CO2 requirements, a vehicle level CO2 cap, or a fleetwide CO2 requirement? Please explain your answer.
We would favour a fleetwide CO2 scheme, because it allows some flexibility for firms to offer a more diverse line-up of vehicles to meet consumer demand. This must also include vans. The climate does not discriminate about emissions and where they have come from, so it is nonsensical to treat a manufacturer’s van emissions as a separate entity to its car ones.
Question 4: Should a minimum range be required for new PHEVs and, if so, at what level should it be set? Please explain your answer.
We do not believe a minimum range should be set for PHEVs because we do not believe that figure is truly meaningful. While a PHEV vehicle might be capable of extending zero-emission running and manufacturers should be encouraged to increase this where possible, if it is not charged regularly and used correctly that figure is essentially meaningless.
Question 8: What are your views on current measures to support demand for zero emission vehicles? What additional measures could further support the transition?
While the current tax benefits for fleet and business buyers of zero-emission vehicles have proven effective, at present, there is no support to drive demand for zero-emission vehicles for private buyers. That has created an unbalanced car market with business buyers accounting for the vast majority of EV sales. That needs to be addressed with increased support from private buyers, either through incentives or tax benefits - particularly for more affordable EVs that are now arriving on the market. Even a small incentive can serve as a strong push to consumers and help address the price gap that remains between ICE vehicles and EVs.
This must too be joined up with the wider policy to road transport taxation. In the most recent budget, VED rates were raised on new internal combustion engined cars while fuel duty was frozen. Throw in the lack of incentives to buy electric cars, and together these three things simply encourage people to stay in their existing cars for longer and opportunities are missed to lower CO2 and increase the amount of zero emissions vehicles on the road.
Question 9: What are your views on whether small volume manufacturers (between 1,000 and 2,499 registrations) should be subject to the 2030 requirements for cars and/or vans?
Question 10: What are your views on whether micro-volume manufacturers (fewer than 1,000 annual registrations) should be subject to the 2030 requirements for cars and/or vans?
Question 12: What is your opinion on exemptions for kit cars from the 2030 requirements for cars and vans?
We have grouped these questions together because we have the same answer for each of them. Autocar strongly believes that small, micro-volume and kit car manufacturers should be exempt from the 2030 requirements. Such firms are a key part of the wider British manufacturing industry, helping to drive technical innovation and employee skills development that benefit the wider economy.
Due to their low volume and the use case of most vehicles they produce, their overall impact on the UK’s CO2 emissions is negligible, while subjecting them to cost-prohibitive electrification requirements could prove insurmountable for many. Most of these vehicles will stay on the roads for decades and do minimal mileage each year. We do recognise that many of these firms are already looking at electrification solutions, so we would welcome incentives and support for them to pursue innovative and cost-effective emission-reduction technology that could ultimately benefit the wider industry.
Question 11: What is your opinion on exemptions for Special Purpose Vehicles from the 2030 requirements for cars and vans?
Current electrification technology is both costly and has limitations in certain use cases. Therefore, we feel it is important that any requirements for Special Purpose Vehicles are carefully crafted to ensure that there is no impact on the effectiveness of such machines in their intended usage.
It is worth noting that road transport of all kinds is on a trajectory of lowering emissions. Many of these vehicles will be sourced from or based on major OEM vehicles and technologies that have lower emissions regardless.
Part 2: Vehicle Emissions Trading Schemes (VETS) UpdatesQuestion 14: What are your views on the proposal to implement a van-car transfer in VETS? Please explain your answer.
Answer. We would welcome any flexibility here for reasons outlined in question three: the climate does not discriminate about emissions and where they have come from, so it is nonsensical to treat a manufacturer’s van emissions as a separate entity to its car ones.
Question 15: Are there other flexibilities that should be considered within VETS for cars and vans?
Answer. We think it is unfair that CO2 trading is currently frozen at 2021 levels. This gives a car manufacturer no incentive to lower CO2 emissions across its whole fleet, only to sell a set number of EVs. The goal must be to reduce CO2 emissions on the way to zero emissions, and the way VETS is written at the moment doesn’t offer much encouragement for a car manufacturer to do so.
Indeed, a legitimate way to comply is simply throttling back non-zero emissions vehicle sales to artificially boost your proportional sale of zero emissions vehicles. This is surely not the intention of the scheme, and again misses out the chance to lower CO2 emissions by someone switching to a new, surely lower-CO2 emissions vehicle than the one they’re coming out of.
Have your sayThe current consultation runs until Tuesday 18 February.
The form can be found here and submissions must be emailed to zevmandate@dft.gov.uk or sent to ZEV regulations team, Department for Transport, 3rd Floor Great Minster House, 33 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 4DR.
We would love to see your responses, so please email them to us at autocar@haymarket.com.
What’s the best family car? Answering that definitively is almost impossible, even for a title that has been steeped in all things automotive for almost 130 years.
Why? because ‘family’ means so many things for different people, yet being able to cope with the rigours of 2.4 children is at the heart of many a car design’s brief.
That being said, a good family car has to get the basics of comfort, space and practicality just right while also being a competent all-rounded that can handle longer schleps up the motorway and quick jaunts around town.
It doesn’t matter whether you’re nurturing your first newborn while balancing work or you’ve got a car full of offspring and all the clobber that comes with them: there are a great number of cars that can fill the role of ‘family wagon’.
Offering a broad range of capabilities and successfully hitting the family car brief, the BMW 3 Series Touring estate is our top pick for its practicality, pleasing driving dynamics and impressive plug-in hybrid option.
Stay with us as we reveal the best family cars on sale in the UK, no matter how you define ‘family’.
2 Hybrid (middle) is confirmed as the direct replacement for the older modelPure-petrol and mild-hybrid hatchback is dropped in favour of newer, Toyota Yaris-based 2 Hybrid
The Mazda 2 has been axed in the UK following its effective replacement by the Mazda 2 Hybrid, a rebadged Toyota Yaris.
The petrol supermini can no longer be ordered brand new, and a spokesperson for Mazda confirmed to Autocar that just a “few hundred” examples remain in showrooms across the nation.
It brings to an end a near-decade-long run for the supermini. It arrived in the UK in April 2015 and earned praise for being fun to drive, with decent turn of pace and a smart cabin. It was facelifted in 2019 and then again in 2023, each update adding extra tech.
Mazda didn't elaborate on why the 2 was cancelled, but the spokesperson told Autocar: “As we move towards increased electrification of our cars, the Mazda 2 Hybrid meets consumer demand in the B-segment and is a step in our journey to ensure all our cars have some form of electrification by 2030.”
The 2's age alone meant that it was due for replacement, but it's possible that Mazda was also encouraged to axe it by the UK’s zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate – the government’s official timetable forcing car makers to gradually ramp EV sales up to 80% in 2030 and 100% by 2035.
Under current legislation, each mainstream manufacturer in the UK is assigned a total carbon ‘credit’ allowance annually. This is based on its total sales in the previous year, as well as the average CO2 emissions of the petrol, diesel and hybrid cars that it sold in 2021.
If a manufacturer cuts its CO2 emissions to below this allowance, it can convert its spare carbon credits into de-facto sales that count towards its ZEV sales target. This exchange takes place at a rate of 167 carbon credits to one ZEV ‘sale’.
In simple terms, for every 167g/km that a manufacturer cuts from the total CO2 emissions of the petrol, diesel and hybrid cars it sells in any given year, it has to sell one fewer electric car to hit its ZEV target.
Autocar understands that Mazda sold around 4400 examples of the 2 last year, split between roughly 1700 pure-petrol cars and 2700 mild-hybrids.
The pure-petrol emits 109g/km while the mild-hybrid emits 107g/km. This gives a tally of around 474,000g/km last year.
Had those 4400 cars been 2 Hybrids instead, Mazda would have saved around 90,000g of CO2, because it emits a much lower 87g/km.
This would have allowed Mazda to sell roughly 500 extra ICE cars – 2% of its total registration last year – without facing fines for doing so.
This is particularly pertinent to Mazda, which will only offer one EV (the electric MX-30 crossover) in the UK until the arrival of the new 6e saloon next year.
Autocar understands the electric MX-30 comprised around 5% of the brand’s UK sales in 2024, far short of the ZEV mandate’s target of 22%.
It should be noted that, according to the Department for Transport, no company was fined for breaching the ZEV mandates last year.
But with the targets set to ramp up harshly after this year, manufacturers will be placed under even greater pressure – and marginal gains will become an absolute priority.
Big-selling (and relatively high-polluting) petrol superminis in the vein of the 2 are likely to become the first casualties of this race to slash emissions and win de-facto EV sales.
Manufacturers may instead look to flog increasing numbers of hybrids and plug-in hybrids to slash their CO2 tallies, generating additional credits to cover slower-than-expected growth in sales of electric cars.
Kia has revealed the production design for its Volkswagen ID 3-rivalling EV4 ahead of a launch later this year.
Little changed from the concept shown in 2023, the EV4 arrives to fill the gap between the EV3 hatchback and the EV5 SUV that's due to launch in Europe soon.
It will be sold primarily as a five-door hatch in Europe, where it will be a natural rival to the ID 3 as well as the Hyundai Kona Electric, Renault Mégane E-Tech and the Mini Aceman.
The four-door fastback version, designed mainly for other global markets, looks to keep the same wheelbase but add a more rakish rear end and with it some extra boot capacity.
Kia hasn't given any specifications for the EV4 yet, but it will share its E-GMP platform with the Korean brand's other bespoke EVs and thus be offered with a choice of either a 58kWh or 81kWh battery and either front- or four-wheel drive.
It should tout a maximum range of more than 350 miles but is likely to stick with 400V electricals (rather than 800V) for charging speeds of up to 128kW, as with the EV3 and EV5.
All Kia EVs are destined to receive hot GT versions, so a 4WD range-topper with power and pace to match the Tesla Model 3 Performance is expected down the line.
Details of the interior remain under wraps, but the EV4 concept revealed in 2023 gives a good idea of what to expect, with a sleek, minimalist dashboard topped by a wraparound digital display, a step-through front cabin and a focus on upmarket textiles throughout.
The EV4 will be fully detailed on 27 February at Kia's annual EV Day showcase, where it will also reveal a concept previewing the EV2, a sub-4m hatch that will take on the Renault 5 from next year, with a starting price of around £25,000.
Vision Driving Experience is test mule for Neue Klasse modelsThe Vision Driving Experience is a test mule for the brand's next-gen vehicle dynamics technology
BMW has revealed the radical Vision Driving Experience, a quad-motor high-performance text vehicle fitted with five fans designed to suck it to the ground that is being used to hone the advanced technology that will power its next-generation of Neue Klasse electric vehicles – including the forthcoming M3 EV.
While the powertrain layout, featuring four high-power motors mounted on each axle of the vehicle, has clear parallels to plans for the next-generation M3, BMW insists the Vision Driving Experience serves a wider purpose as a rolling test rig – and the lack of sporty bodywork elements marks it out from spy shots of the first electric car from the Munich firm’s performance division. Because the focus is on vehicle development, BMW has not given a power output for the machine.
The focus of the Vision Driving Experience is to be a high-performance machine that can be used to push development of the ‘Heart of Joy’, the new black box computer system that will combine the drivetrain and driving dynamics systems in all future Neue Klasse EV models. That system will first be seen in the next-generation iX3 that is set to be revealed later this year, and on the next-gen 3 Series saloon that will follow soon afterwards.
Frank Weber, BMW’s development boss, said that the Heart of Joy system “enables us to take driving pleasure not just to the next level, but another one beyond that,” adding that the system would offer “efficient dynamics squared”.
Autocar was given access to the Vision Driving Experience for a ride in the car, and to talk to the engineers who have developed it.
First ride: inside the BMW Vision Driving Experience, and how it will develop a computer chip"The engineers won’t even tell me how much power this has,” says development driver Jens Klingmann, as he casually hurls the BMW Vision Driving Experience into a corner fast enough for the tyres to howl in protest.
“But it’s a lot.” Given that my insides are still churning from the hit of acceleration at the start, he didn’t really need to say that last bit.
The Vision Driving Experience is, indeed, a lot. It’s a lot of car, with a lot of motors, a lot of fans (we will get to those) and a lot of performance.
And it has a lot of significance for the ongoing development of BMW’s next-generation Neue Klasse EVs, which will start to arrive this year. This isn’t just your average prototype, then.
But at heart that’s basically what it is: a quad-motor, high-power EV test mule styled on the next-gen 3 Series saloon, which has been pounding around various test facilities during recent months.
Four motors and a ridiculous power output? That sounds quite a lot like the forthcoming first electric M3, doesn’t it? Except BMW insists the Vision Driving Experience (let’s call it the VDE for short) isn’t a test mule for the next M3.
Instead, the firm describes it as a one-off test rig on wheels, a moving laboratory used to hone technology being developed for all future Neue Klasse models in an extreme environment.
The development work being done with it is as relevant to the next single-motor, entry-level iX3 SUV as it will be to whatever M division’s engineers concoct for their electric offerings.
Perhaps because of the development work for which it has been created, until now the VDE has been cloaked in secrecy – and we’re not just talking about its camouflage wrap.
But the fact that BMW recently strapped me (thankfully tightly) into the passenger seat for a short – but very fast – ride shows that Munich now wants to showcase exactly why it has been created. Although Klingmann’s inability (or perhaps refusal) to share its power output indicates that the veil of secrecy isn’t fully lifted.
What BMW has confirmed is that the VDE is powered by four electric motors – one for each wheel – and can produce peak torque of 13,269lb ft.
And no, that’s not a typo. There isn’t an ofofficial power output, but given its ridiculous torque output, you can probably guess it’s pretty high. BMW hasn’t given any performance stats, either, but after my ride in it, I would say the 0-62mph time can be described as ‘brisk’.
Beyond the four motors, the other thing we have been told about are those fans. Five of them, in fact. BMW calls them impellers, and they serve to literally suck the car to the ground.
Each fan requires 50kW of energy to run, but combined they add around 1000kg of downforce without creating any drag, in turn allowing Klingmann to push even harder in corners.
All of that torque and downforce is really there to develop one small but very significant black box full of computer chips and loaded with software.
That would be BMW’s new Heart of Joy, the unusually named hardware and software stack that will unify the computer systems that run the powertrain and driving dynamics systems on future EVs into a single unit.
It’s the first time BMW has unified those systems, and the firm claims the system has been developed entirely in-house.
“The Heart of Joy will run all the key driving functions of the car,” says BMW driving dynamics expert Christian Thalmeier. “But to develop those, we need to push the technology.
Even production cars with only one electric motor will gain advantages from the work we’re doing on a car with four motors.”
It might seem like overkill to build a superpowerful, fan-laden development hack just to test a computer processing unit, but the idea is that if the Heart of Joy can handle anything the VDE can throw at it in the real world, it can handle pretty much anything.
So how does it work? Traditionally, the powertrain and driving dynamics systems have been separate units.
The powertrain system takes the inputs from your foot on the accelerator and sends that as a request to the powertrain, whether a combustion engine or a single or pair of electric motors.
Meanwhile, a separate driving dynamics unit receives inputs from the steering wheel and brakes, along with any other data the car’s sensors might get from the external environment.
Those two systems run in parallel, so there’s a small but potentially significant lag when they need to send data to each other, and there are limitations on how closely they can operate together.
The Heart of Joy unites those systems into a single unit that receives all those inputs in the same place, processes them simultaneously and then sends the information to up to four motors along with the brakes, steering and so on. BMW says it allows for communication that’s up to 10 times faster than that used on cars that were on sale in 2021.
That’s a big boost when trying to precisely modulate power and braking to best fit the conditions. But there are other benefits too. On most current EVs, friction braking is controlled by the driving dynamics unit while regeneration through the motors is the responsibility of the powertrain system.
That’s why you can sometimes feel an imbalance if you’re slowing using the regen and then need to apply the brakes.
“When recuperation is only done by the powertrain, you can’t use the whole potential of it,” says Thalmeier. “You need the driving dynamics system to work out how to enlarge the recuperation.”
He cites the example of a rearbiased car – yes, future BMW EVs will still be rear-driven or rear-biased – cornering at speed. “
When there’s a load change, you can only put a certain amount of longitudinal force on the tyres before the car becomes unstable,” he says.
“So to keep the car balanced, you have to take away either lateral or longitudinal force. Because you’re cornering and you can’t remove the lateral force, you have to reduce the recuperation to keep the car stable. But that’s not what we want: we want to add stability by recuperation.
“Now, though, we’re so quick at taking data from the sensors on the car about yaw rate, lateral and longitudinal acceleration and how stable the car is that we can change things. If it’s still stable, we can do a bit of recuperation, and when it gets unstable, it will be quickly reduced.”
There’s another benefit: the Heart of Joy can take your braking inputs and work out the most efficient way of stopping the car, which in most cases will be via the motor.
That increases the use of regen, which BMW claims makes the car up to 25% more efficient. Not a huge amount but a useful gain, given that the aim is for most drivers to not know whether it’s the brakes or the motor slowing their machine.
The Heart of Joy won’t just help when you’re slowing down your BMW, though: it will help you go faster.
Again, a combustion car has a single power source, so systems such as variable four-wheel drive or torque vectoring have to go through various mechanical systems to divide up that power.
But the new system can take power from one, two, three or four motors and continuously adjust where it’s sent to, keeping the car better balanced and more stable. Besides simply adding raw power, Thalmeier says adding motors will make a big difference to future Neue Klasse models.
“We’re influencing the driving dynamics,” he adds. “If you think of three electric motors with one on the front axle and two on the rear, you can help steer with the rear axle by making one wheel faster and the other slower.
"So you can make the car agile purely through running the electric motors at different speeds. Any existing actuator or rear-wheel steering system isn’t as quick as our new electric motors will be.”
Which brings us back to the passenger seat of the VDE, with Klingmann laughing as he jams the throttle and sends the machine down the straight of the BMW Spartanburg Performance Centre test track at something approaching warp speed.
It’s actually surprisingly comfortable inside, with comfy sports seats and a working version of BMW’s new iDrive system on the dashboard. Even in its test hacks, Munich does premium well.
But can you feel the Heart of Joy at work? Being honest, no, not really, but that’s in part because on a cold day in South Carolina tyre grip is limited and Klingmann confesses the road-legal rubber is the limiting factor.
But as my innards slowly settle once I’ve escaped the passenger seat, the performance of the Vision Driving Experience – and the systems underpinning it – is clear.
The closest comparison I can make is with a passenger ride in an electric rallycross supercar. Impressive, then. And it certainly whets the appetite for the potential of a quad-motor electric M3.
Why five impeller fans are needed to make the car suckThe BMW Vision Driving Experience’s five impeller fans are the car’s undoubted party piece, as demonstrated when its engineers fired them up for a demonstration when it was back in the garage.
For a comparison of how loud they are, imagine standing underneath the wing of an Airbus A380 when the pilot presses the start button. Essentially, they serve to stick the car to the ground, adding grip without creating aerodynamic downforce. But could they ever reach production?
“You won’t see anything like this in a production car,” says Thalmeier. “It’s just too expensive. They are just for the system on this car. If you have a lot of downforce and then you add a lot of torque, it makes it very hard to accelerate. What we’re interested in with this car is how to deal with the acceleration in the software.
“It’s purely a development tool. It’s not even a driving dynamics tool; it’s just another thing that makes it faster for us to develop functions.”
Subaru MV pick-up was a competent farmhandIn 1982, Autocar gathered the six most significant imports on a farm in rural Kent to see what was what
When we write about off-road vehicles, it usually involves larking about in a quarry. But 4x4s aren’t just toys for motoring enthusiasts; for many people, they’re an absolute necessity for daily life and/or work.
Chief among those people are, of course, farmers. British farms were rapidly mechanised during World War II, and it was the native Land Rover that became the agricultural vehicle of choice as peace returned – and then dominated for decades.
In the late 1970s, though, it came under pressure from multifarious 4x4s arriving from abroad. So, in 1982, Autocar gathered the six most significant imports on a farm in rural Kent to see what was what.
Static tests were loading sheep, calves, hay bales and fertiliser bags; dynamic tests were towing a laden livestock trailer, crossing a sodden, snowy ploughed field and negotiating a steep and tortuous Downland route.
There was meant to be another – climbing a steep, muddy hill – but none of our 4x4s could actually get to the base, such was the slime at the gate. Our farmer judges were sure that a Landie would also have failed there, mind you.
Enjoy full access to the complete Autocar archive at the magazineshop.com
Predictably, Suzuki’s tiny LJ80 (or Jimny), with its mere 225kg payload, could hold the least: just three calves, two sheep or four bales (after a fight with the tailgate).
However, it “could be ideal as an economical, low-cost means of achieving quick access to all points of a large farm or estate, with its very real off-road capabilities. Its 797cc [four-pot] has only 41bhp – quite adequate for nippy runabout work but a little restrictive in harder-working applications.”
Modest fuel economy was on the upside, along with the price of just £3799 (£13,290 in modern money).
The Daihatsu F20 (or Taft) wasn’t much larger but could hold a fair bit more, with its 385kg payload, although it was “nothing like as refined, being less of a ‘fun’ vehicle”, and “more agricultural inside” – despite costing a much more substantial £5721 (£20,015).
“Nothing to get excited about if you want a vehicle to transport sheep or hay bales but more than adequate for a vehicle that might be called on to rescue a sheep from a snowy hilltop,” we concluded.
The Jeep Laredo (CJ-7) was a mixed bag: “It coped well with conditions on the farm, traversing our test field with scornful ease and leaping playfully up ridiculous inclines.
It proved one of the better towing vehicles and with automatic transmission was without doubt the easiest to drive.
It let us down only when required to start in thick, greasy mud at the foot of a steep ascent. However, it loses out on the farm due to its relatively small load area.”
We also had to remove its rear-mounted spare wheel in order to access its towbar.
Still, at £8499 (£29,735), “it deserves consideration for anyone wanting something prettier than a Land Rover but not quite as big and upmarket as a Range Rover [at £14,260]”.
For a few quid less, you could buy a Portaro Pampas, a Portuguese version of Romania’s ARO 24 (which incidentally had also spawned the original Dacia Duster of 1980).
We expected its steel bodywork to preclude that – indeed, our test car was already rusty – but the farmers didn’t care, noting that fertiliser would corrode aluminium anyway.
Its seats and ride were comfier than the Landie’s, its Daihatsu diesel four was impressively torquey and we barely even needed to engage 4WD when off-roading it.
All this plus its large load space – seven calves, eight sheep or nine bales – made it the farmers’ pick.
We preferred the £4485 (£15,690) Subaru MV (or Brat) pick-up, it being derived from an actual car. No leaf springs for us.
“This is the [4x4] that the farmer’s wife will love to drive into town,” we said, and despite its low ground clearance and fairly normal-looking tyres, “it simply flew through the glutinous mud”, thanks to its “light weight and high power” – of 79bhp…
Finally, and by far the best for carrying (no fewer than 22 bales), we had Toyota’s Mk3 Hilux, at £5560 (£19,455): “It’s rather like the MV but is more of a chore to drive over long distances. It will never get hung up on the deepest of rutted tracks, and the towing was a walkover.”
Was any better than the Landie, though? There was no mention of it – which perhaps speaks for itself.
Seminal T50 is a modern day McLaren F1GMA's grand new HQ is now nearing completion, with T50 production already in full swing. We drop by
The day’s second big surprise comes when Gordon Murray strolls in. Although his name is on the building, Murray isn’t the person we’ve been expecting.
We’re relaxing in The Engine Room – a spacious waiting room adorned with V12 murals and displays off the reception area of the magnificent new Gordon Murray Group (GMG) headquarters, near Windlesham in Surrey – soon to begin interviews with CEO Phillip Lee and chief test driver Dario Franchitti.
The initial big surprise had been the first sight of the building itself: large, modern, glassy and extremely imposing.
Unlike most visitors, we saw the full frontal aspect by cheekily following ‘VIP parking’ signs and thus alighting on a wide apron right out front, eyeballing through the glass a pair of Gordon Murray Automotive (GMA) supercars, a T50 and a T33, parked right beside the reception desk.
We haven’t expected to see Murray, whom the car world is quietly aware has been facing some medical challenges. Turns out he’s now recovering well, and the proof is his presence here today, wearing a wide smile above a statement shirt that’s his usual choice when feeling good.
We’re among the earliest visitors here (work isn’t quite finished), so Murray has decided he will be the one to show us around.
I’ve heard him say before that he gets as much of a buzz out of designing buildings as cars. And as we begin to walk and look, we’re immediately aware of the love of design and quality materials, plus the gimlet eye for detail, that goes with everything Murray does.
First, the HQ. Highams Park is a 58-acre site previously occupied by failed technology firm Kamcorp (owner, for a time, of the Frazer-Nash and Bristol Cars businesses) and by the British Oxygen Company before that.
There’s still a dilapidated, decades-old building on the site that, in plan view, takes the outline of an oxygen molecule. This was a lot of trouble to go to, Murray observes drily, given that no one ever saw the place from above.
GMG is in the throes of moving all operations here from nearby Shalford and Dunsfold, having recently sold off its electric vehicle business, Gordon Murray Technologies, to concentrate on supercar manufacturing.
The mighty new building already handles GMG’s commercial and management functions, welcomes visitors, helps them specify cars, builds cars to order in a huge hand-assembly hall to the rear (it looks like two or three Formula 1 assembly shops rolled into one) and will soon have its own paint shop. There’s also a special car collection showroom.
Next to the assembly hall is a busy service centre that already contains a sample of the 50 or so T50s already in service. Murray is proud that a decent number of owners seem to be using the cars on the road, rather than keeping them as ornaments.
We walk through it all, admiring the simplicity, logic, quality and modernity with which he attacks all things.
Soon this building will be joined by a nearby design studio and R&D centre, flanking a short shakedown test track. It’s not for speed, Murray assures us; the (so far very co-operative) local council wouldn’t like that.
There will always be space also for his own eclectic car collection, a fascinating array of cars he built himself early on and cars that he loves unconditionally and feels have influenced him in his career.
A 60-year commemorative event is just around the corner, and once Highams Park is finished (Murray is a stickler for completing what he starts), there’s a plan to open it to visitors.
The final flourish, typical of someone who has brought so much science and innovation to the car business, will be the opening of an educational institute on the site, aiming to bring capable young talent to the car business.
This is a few years away and specifics of the qualifications to be offered are still being decided, but Murray won’t care if his 30-odd proteges at a time go to other car companies.
The only aim is to attract talented people to a business he knows, better than most, can provide lifelong fulfilment.
The motorsport hero helping to modernise Murray’s McLaren F1It is by no means a given that a racing driver will be into road cars. Some aren’t interested, because driving incredibly fast around circuits gives them a thrill that they can never replicate on the road in something slower and more boring. Going fast for them is everything.
Dario Franchitti, four-time Indycar Series champion and three-time Indianapolis 500 winner, is not that kind of racing driver. “I love my road cars,” says the Scot as we walk towards a GMA T50 supercar, in which he will be driving me around some of Surrey’s most pockmarked and flooded roads. “Some would say I’m obsessed with road cars. I love everything about the automobile. I’ve been that way since I was five years old.”
As a bloke who knocks about in a Lancia Delta Integrale, has owned a Ferrari F40 for 25 years (and drives it as often as possible) and runs a Porsche Carrera GT, a Ferrari 355 and a 1984 Aston Martin V8 Vantage, it’s fair to say that Franchitti is one of us.
This is what has made him the ideal fit for GMA, where according to the business card he is director of brand, performance and product. Less formally, he’s a conduit between the development engineers and Murray in making GMA’s cars feel as the boss would like them.
This isn’t a casual dalliance, either: Franchitti is not merely an ambassador, rolled out to glad-hand customers. A day after this interview, he will fly to Spain for a week of proving ground testing. This is now his career. (His younger brother Marino performs a similar role for Singer, the Porsche 911 restomodder.)
Not all drivers could make the leap from a career in which success is delivered via minute levels of data into one that involves almost a wilful abandonment of numbers. Murray says he “doesn’t care” about measurables like performance figures.
The T50, despite its doubtless prodigious speed, has been designed, like the McLaren F1 was, to engage, not simply to go fast. Franchitti’s interview is peppered with words like ‘feel’ and ‘response’. Although one number of which the GMA team is proud is the kerb weight, which starts with a nine.
This is my first time inside a T50, as Franchitti pulls out of a junction from walking pace in third gear to demonstrate the flexibility of the engine, plus the fact that the Cosworth-developed, naturally aspirated V12 has precious few kilograms to accelerate.
“You will feel it when you get to drive it,” he says. “You will feel the lack of weight and quickness of response.”
I won’t be driving today, but there are things you can tell from one of the side seats. One is the compliance of the ride, plus what seems like a generous ground clearance by the standards of supercars.
“It’s unbelievably useful,” says Franchitti. “Any speed bumps it just goes over. It’s nuts. I’ve tried really hard, but I’ve never bottomed out this car, going through car parks, crazy California inclines, even at [the test track] Nardò.”
The compliance aids traction, too, although on a road like this and with 664bhp, such things are relative. But “it’s got really good traction”, Franchitti tells me. “Gordon hates rear anti-roll bars, so there’s no rear bar.”
The tyres are very much road-focused, Michelin Pilot 4Ss. “And they’re off the shelf,” says Franchitti, which makes them easier for customers to source down the line. For a car of this performance, they’re relatively modestly sized, too: only 295-section at the rear.
“One of our biggest challenges was to get them to talk to your hands,” says Franchitti. “When we nailed it, it was a eureka moment.
The more grip a tyre produces, the quicker the moment when it lets go.” The T50 has power-assisted steering only below 6mph to ease manoeuvring; beyond that, it’s au naturel.
“It doesn’t have to have a quick steering rack in it to trick people into thinking it’s responsive,” says Franchitti, “which I hate in some modern cars. You know which ones I’m talking about.” I think I do.
Some of them, though, have very nice engines. As does the T50. It would be remiss of me not to mention the bespoke 4.0-litre V12, because it sounds so very, very good.
“The carbonfibre airbox is basically tuned to give a resonance based on throttle angle, and the noise that we experience is all linked to throttle angle,” says Franchitti.
“That’s one of the things Gordon learned from the McLaren F1, whose induction noise is second to none. It’s more difficult with a smaller displacement engine [the F1’s BMW-sourced V12 displaced 6.1 litres], but we all knew when we had got it.”
Other than the compliance, sound and low inertia, what strikes me about the T50 is how Franchitti can pick a line, even on these roads, owing to the car’s relatively modest width of 1850mm. The F1’s footprint is similar, and I wonder aloud if a driver teleported from one to the other, knowing nothing of the lineage, would notice that the two had come from the same hand.
“I think in seating position and in ethos, yes, but it drives completely differently. It’s not a subtle difference,” answers Franchitti. “One of the memories I think I will keep for the rest of my life is that Gordon was in this very car and I was in an F1, and I was chasing him down a mountainside. I was going as hard as I could in an F1 to keep up with him, and I was relieved to get out of it at the end. You realise how things have moved on in 30 years.”
That drive was part of what sealed it for Franchitti as a serial special car owner and driver: he had to have a T50. Except that, by that time, they were all spoken for.“I’ve had to persuade the big man to sell me a prototype,” he says.
Delaying the order is not a mistake he has repeated with the upcoming T33.
A car fan looking beyond the fan carGMG CEO Phillip Lee belongs to an extremely rare group of people in the car creation chain: he’s a bean-counter who loves cars. Lee trained as an accountant and joined a global accountancy group early on but soon transferred to cars and worked at restructuring and improving businesses in China, Europe, the US and South America.
About a decade ago, he returned to the UK to join Chinese giant Geely, first at taxi maker LEVC and then Lotus, before landing happily at GMG about five years ago, following an introduction by company director Carl-Peter Forster.
“I was also very keen to do whatever I could to progress the true British sports car, and it seemed to me that Gordon and his operation were the embodiment of that,” says Lee.
He first joined the management, then became CEO of the whole operation three years ago, when Murray became chairman. Right now, Lee is extremely busy getting cars built, but he’s also in the enviable position of being “sold out” until 2028.
GMA has four distinct supercar models to build, and there’s already a buyer’s name against every car. The company is currently about halfway through building its 100 T50 three-seat ‘fan cars’, expecting to finish with 40-odd US customer cars by mid-2025.
Then there will be 25 special track-only T50S Niki Lauda cars to make later in the year, before attention turns to the two-seat T33 for delivery in 2026. After that there’s a T33 Spider and beyond that, potentially, an extra-performance T33.
Starting T33 production next year will be a deceptively big job, says Lee, even though this supercar is simpler in specification than the T50.
It’s because the T33 carries global type approval, whereas the T50 – very much a halo car, with exotic features like the fan system and legislative challenges resulting from the three-seat layout – carries only small-series approvals in the markets where it’s sold.
When everything you make sells instantly, I ask Lee, why not just make bigger batches? Surely you could save a bundle on development costs?
With his brand-image hat in place, he firmly bats this away. “We’re building a business here,” replies Lee, “and as well as our endemic values, like driving perfection, we offer exclusivity. If you say you will build 100 cars, that’s what you have to do. We’re not a one-hit wonder; we’re a business. We do what we say.”
About 50 cars were built during 2024 and the aim for 2025 is 120, heading for an ideal output of 150.
By then, GMG will have added 50 people to its present 350-strong workforce. In time past, Murray suggested that there were new V12-engined cars coming beyond the T33 line-up, but Lee is mysterious about the form they might take – except to say that they will be “something Gordon has always wanted to build” and “something you might not expect”.
Further details will come soon, he adds. In the meantime, there is a model cycle plan to 2040, with the platforms and powerplants already decided.
But how many will be V12s? Lee is evasive, insisting that the company is already engaged in hybrid and hydrogen powertrain research – and pointing out that even the existing V12 has an integrated starter-generator on the end of its crankshaft.
“It’s all a moving target,” he says. “Big cities are framing regulations of their own, and the situation is even more fragmented in the US. But we’re ready for the future.
“What helps is that every one of our cars is an individual. We don’t just design a system and put a car around it. That’s also the principle we will use in the future. We’re ready.”
The latest government consultation on how quickly the UK car market should migrate to fully electric vehicles concerns what will happen between 2030 and 2035.
But it has made it 100% clear where the entire industry, even small- and micro-scale manufacturers, will stand after that.
All new cars, no matter who makes them, must be fully zero-emissions after 1 January 2035. No engines. No exemptions. Nobody, as was the case previously and which remains the case in the EU, is ‘out of scope’ of the regulations.
Are you a car maker that produces five newly registered cars a year by hand? From 2035, you will be in the same boat as Ford.
It’s worth reiterating how clear this is. The latest consultation, launched on Christmas Eve and running to 18 February, asks questions and puts forward proposals that include whether small-scale car makers should be included in the 2030 changes.
They’re the reason why Lister boss Lawrence Whittaker was on the news last week seeking urgent clarification, having stopped all of the firm’s future development plans.
The government has acknowledged that “there is a precedent for treating small manufacturers differently” and stated: “Kit cars represent a very small overall segment of the market.
It is proposed that applying the requirements to kit cars would therefore not be proportionate.”
Beyond that, though, there’s no doubt, no hidden meaning, no ambiguity, as paragraph 62 of the consultation reads: “It is clear that all manufacturers must decarbonise according to the ambitious timetable for all new cars and vans to be ZEV by 2035, including those made by low-volume manufacturers.”
Paragraph 64: “For all manufacturers of all sizes, new cars and vans must be 100% zero-emission by 2035.”The short of it is: if you want a combustion- engined Caterham, you have 10 years left.
This is despite the acknowledgement that “smaller-volume manufacturers account for a very small proportion of overall UK vehicle sales and limited amounts of CO2” and that “they play a vital role in supporting jobs, investment, skills and expertise within the UK automotive industry”.
It’s hoped that in future they “will play an important role in the transition to ZEVs” (all from paragraph 61), whether they and their customers want to or not.
It doesn’t matter that, as it stands, it requires considerably more CO2 emissions to make a zero-emissions car than it does a pure-ICE one, nor that micro-volume cars are typically driven such small distances annually that it could take decades, if ever, for one to reach the point where a BEV would have been better for the planet.
This will especially be the case once non-fossil-based, renewable ICE fuels – which will be so essential for construction, aerospace and agriculture – come on-stream.
Concessions for these are being considered within the EU.It doesn’t matter that Ariel’s annual output wouldn’t keep Toyota in business for nine minutes. It doesn’t matter that these small companies win awards for exports.
It doesn’t matter that most UK race circuits don’t have and may not get the electrical capacity to quickly charge EVs’ batteries. It’s as simple as this: if it has four wheels, to be sold new in 10 years, it must have no tailpipe.Perhaps you think this is fine.
These are agile companies employing clever people. Previously Ariel has said an electric future doesn’t faze it, while Caterham has dabbled with a prototype Seven EV – although it couldn’t get it to work or, more pertinently, find many interested customers.
And it may be that promised new battery technology of the sort that is dissuading some current ICE car owners from making the EV switch (the solid-state batteries promised by Nissan in 2028, Stellantis’s lithium-sulphur batteries for 2030) will make an electric niche car better, lighter and more fun than it is today.
If that is the case (and this is true to an extent of the wider car industry), the regulations won’t be necessary.
We didn’t mandate cassettes, CDs, minidiscs or MP3 players into existence because of a dislike of vinyl; new tech was just preferable, so we chose it and left the hobbyists alone.
The same path would easily suit niche car makers: if we want to buy it, they will want to make it, and those who don’t will be so few that it will make no difference to the world.
In the meantime, I’m not a natural fan of whataboutery or ‘they hate you’ conspiracies, but I find myself being tested.
Peugeot is considering reviving the Peugeot 208 GTi as a hot EV, new boss Alain Favey has said.
Favey said bringing the GTi moniker back was “a question I’ve been asking myself very much” since taking over the role of Peugeot CEO from Linda Jackson as part of a wide-reaching Stellantis management shake-up just 10 days ago,
The GTi badge has not appeared on a 208 since the second-generation car arrived in 2019 and it has not adorned a Peugeot car since the 308 GTi went off sale in 2021.
The Peugeot Sport Engineered (PSE) sub-brand was originally expected to fill the GTi gap in Peugeot’s line-up, but it was only ever attached to a variant of the 508 and was effectively killed off in the UK in December following the culling of that model.
But when asked during the brand’s E-Lion Day if there were any plans for an e-208 GTi, Favey said: “I am very eager to connect the Peugeot brand with what it stands for to its past, to its heritage in every sense.
“So we will look back at what the heritage of the brand is and we will see to what extent this can be adapted to the modern world – and there is nothing excluded in our review of this and certainly not the GTi badge, for sure.”
It would make sense for any hot models to use the same set up as Lancia Ypsilon HF hatch and Abarth’s 600e crossover, with which the e-208 shares its e-CMP platform. Both send 237bhp through their front wheels and use a Torsen limited-slip differential.
The Abarth 600e is also offered with a 278bhp motor, but this is unlikely to be offered on the smaller e-208, given its positioning.
Giving the green light to an e-208 GTi would also be likely to result in a hot version of the Vauxhall Corsa Electric, given the two models are twinned.
It remains to be seen whether Peugeot or Vauxhall deems an electric hot hatch to be commercially viable, especially as the Corsa and 208 are expected to be replaced next year by new-generation models based on Stellantis’s new STLA Small platform.
But given the Abarth 600e proves that the e-CMP platform can comfortably accommodate a more potent front motor and a performance-targeted chassis makeover, hot versions of the 208 and Corsa could be launched as performance swangsongs for the outgoing generation.
Peugeot has launched five-seat versions of its 5008 and e-5008, trading the third row of seats for one of the biggest boots offered in the segment.
The SUVs now offer 994 litres of cargo room behind the second row of seats, which is 78 litres more than in a seven-seat 5008 with the third row folded down.
While the seven-seat 5008 already offered more room than rivals with the rear bench folded, such as the Kia Sorento (813 litres), the five-seater moves it to just 100 litres behind the mammoth Land Rover Defender 130.
This setup will be available on all versions of the combustion-engined 5008 and electric e-5008 but not in all markets, said Peugeot.
This is expected to include - although not yet confirmed - the new dual-motor e-5008. Revealed today, this boasts 321bhp, combining the standard front-wheel-drive car’s 211bhp motor with a 110bhp motor on the rear axle. The four-wheel-drive powertrain yields 311 miles between charges. This setup is also being introduced on the e-3008.
The new dual-motor e-5008 will sit alongside the standard single-motor, front-wheel-drive model, which offers a range of up to 414 miles.
The five-seat 5008 is expected to slightly undercut the seven-seat 5008, which starts at £38,095 in mild-hybrid form and £48,595 as an EV.
Deliveries will begin by June.
It’s a sign of our embattled and topsy-turvy times that sales of the best luxury SUVs are the healthiest they've ever been, despite the ongoing cost of living crisis and ever-pressing climate concerns.
Luxury SUVs are some of the most lavishly appointed machines on the market, melding the cosseting comfort of an executive saloon with refined and mature road manners.
Many of these machines can also squeeze in seven occupants and still have space to spare, and despite what you think about their conspicuous consumption, there’s no doubting their versatility or the depth of engineering on display.
Don't forget that many of these models can head further off the beaten track than you’d ever thought possible – although whether you want to pitch diamond-cut 21in alloys and special-order matt paintwork against mud, rocks and hawthorn hedges is another matter.
And despite their bluff appearance and gas-guzzling reputation, many of our contenders in this list feature plug-in hybrid powertrains that could save a fair chunk in fuel costs and deliver some healthy tax savings for company car drivers.
We’ve picked out 10 of the best for you, but our list is topped by the Range Rover Sport - read on to see why it beats rivals from Porsche, Mercedes, Volvo and more.
Recently, we featured a road test of the new Audi S5, and the process of writing it gave me an excuse to engage in an underrated pastime: playing with car configurators.
All in the name of research, you understand. Not time-wasting. Not at all.
The thing with cars like the S5 is that you don’t just have to restrict yourself to the pedestrian UK version; you can indulge in the much fuller-featured German one.
Who needs Duolingo when audi.de can teach you useful words like ‘Außengeräuschdämmung’ and ‘Kopfstützenlautsprecher’? Once you can make sense of the endless compound words, what’s striking is how much more choice of options and customisation buyers get on the mainland.
Mercedes-Benz is probably an even better example of this than Audi. Take the C-Class. Over here, you get a handful of trim levels (mostly AMG Lines of some description), you can choose a paint colour and an interior colour and that’s it.
In Germany, if you want a C180 that looks like poverty spec on the outside but has every conceivable option inside, with brown nappa leather and adaptive dampers? Good luck trying to resell it later, but it’s your depreciation: go for it.
It’s the same at BMW, which won’t sell you a diesel 5 Series at all in the UK but still offers a 540d (with a straight six) in Germany. This isn’t a new development. Choice has been restricted in the UK for years.
I’ve been told this is largely due to the UK market being driven very strongly by monthly rates and therefore residual values. As such, it’s easier to determine (and maximise) the values for a couple of select trim levels and a handful of option packs rather than a million different individual configurations.
Although there may be some chicken or egg going on here, British buyers generally seem to be more cautious and fashion-driven than European buyers, gravitating towards restrained interior colours but big wheels and some sort of sporty exterior styling.
Complain all you want that cars are getting too expensive: posh trims are what people are buying, even on Dacias.
There’s also clearly more of a trend to buy cars from stock here rather than custom order, which shows in the size of dealerships: they tend to be a lot bigger.
Meanwhile, the product planners have got wise to the fact that they simply don’t need to offer so many variations: it makes things easier for them and means more profit.
I’ve always found it odd that there’s evidently not more demand for individual specifications here, because when I’m spending my imaginary lottery win, it’s so much more satisfying to build the car exactly how I want it, rather than go with the spec that some UK product planner reckoned would be ideal.
Surely that’s one of the big appeals of buying new? I imagine it’s the same when you’re spending real money. But apparently not: although Porsche customers get a little more creative with the brand’s famously extensive configurator, there are still an awful lot of silver 911s with a black interior around.
In the end, it’s a matter of use it or lose it. When we road tested the current E-Class, Mercedes UK said it wouldn’t offer air suspension (which was available abroad) because it didn’t expect there to be much demand for it.
But earlier this year, the Refinement Package appeared in the configurator, which includes air suspension and rear-wheel steering. Evidently, people must have badgered their dealers because they wanted their luxury car to ride properly.
If you’re in the market for a new car, demand the Multikontursitze mit Sitzklimatisierung and say no to the Tiefergelegtes Fahrwerk. Do it for the dreamers – and your spine.
Volkswagen's smallest electric SUV will look nothing like the ID 4 and ID 5Electric T-Cross replacement will be launched in 2026 with bold styling and up to 280 miles of range
Volkswagen will reveal a chunky, supermini-sized electric crossover called the ID 2X at the Munich motor show in September.
Previewed last year, the ID 2X is a higher-riding sibling to the Volkswagen Polo-sized ID 2, which is due to be launched later this year, and will effectively serve as an EV alternative to the T-Cross.
It will be based on the same shortened version of the MEB platform as the ID 2. The crossover is set to be offered exclusively with a single motor on the front axle, giving 223bhp, and a choice of 38kWh and 56kWh batteries - the latter providing a range of around 280 miles.
Volkswagen has previously said the larger battery will be capable of topping up at 125kW to take its state of charge from 10-80% in just 20 minutes.
The smaller-battery car is set to be one of the cheapest electric SUVs on the market when it lands, in line with Volkswagen's ambitious strategy to reduce the production and list price of its EVs.
The ID 2 supermini is planned to be available from £22,000, only slightly more than today's Polo, so the equivalent SUV should go on sale at the £25,000 mark.
Volkswagen CEO Thomas Schäfer confirmed the new baby SUV's name in a post on LinkedIn, where he also revealed that it will make its debut at Munich.
It is the fourth and final entrant in the Volkswagen Group's upcoming range of entry-level electric cars – joining the ID 2, Cupra Raval and Skoda Epiq – and will be built alongside those three cars at a new plant near Barcelona in Spain.
Volkswagen head of design Andreas Mindt has described the ID 2X as a "safe, confident, bold" design that is "simple, like the ID 2 All" - referencing how that concept apes the clean, simplistic cues of previous Golf and Polo models.
Indeed, the resemblance to the supermini is obvious in the preview image, though the higher-riding SUV will have a more upright silhouette with bulkier wheel arches, a distinctive vent-style motif on the C-pillar (which could be glass on the production car) and a chunky rear spoiler. There will be no obvious visual links between this new SUV and today's ID 4 and ID 5, as Mindt looks to usher in a whole new brand image.
It will measure around 4.1m long, have a wheelbase of 2600mm and offer more than the ID 2's 490 litres of boot space - no doubt with the same 50-litre lockable box under the boot floor for charging cables and valuables.
Inside, it is expected to be all but identical to the ID 2, with a 12.9in infotainment screen and 10.9in digital driver display - while adopting physical switches for the audio and climate controls. Volkswagen is aiming to eradicate all glue and hard plastics from its next-generation interiors, in line with a pledge to boost material quality while reducing its cars' environmental impact.
The rollout of the VW Group's new Electric Urban Car Family, as Schäfer calls it, is central to stabilising the VW Group following a turbulent period in which its profits and volumes have dipped significantly, prompting plans for factory closures and swingeing job cuts across Europe.
The group as a whole delivered 2.3% fewer vehicles worldwide in 2024, year on year, chiefly as a result of a drop in global demand for premium vehicles and a challenging retail environment in China.
The decline was felt most harshly at Audi, Bentley and Porsche. Conversely, the more volume-oriented Seat-Cupra brand posted a 7.5% sales uptick and Skoda grew 6.9% - highlighting the rising importance of affordable cars.
Schäfer said that with the launch of the four new electric superminis, "the Brand Group Core is truly bringing its power to the road. We’re on the right track – and now we’re stepping it up a gear".
Meanwhile, in early March, Volkswagen will reveal a concept for a smaller electric city car to replace the Up. Dubbed the ID Every1 and expected to be called the ID 1 in production, the boldly styled Fiat Grande Panda rival will be launched in 2027 with a base price of around £17,000.
Show highlight was this DS 19 suspended on balloons, recreating a '50s ad campaignGallic machines have this intangible allure about them – we head to Rétromobile to find out where the magic lies
There’s something fascinating about French cars – this intangible quality that’s able to turn a humdrum machine into something rather compelling.
It’s a tricky one to pin down, but if one is to tap the source of that famed va-va-voom anywhere, it’s surely Rétromobile. Held on the outskirts of Paris, down the road from Parc André Citroën, it’s a huge classic car bash that attracts the backing of major retailers, owners’ clubs and manufacturers. You will see a real variety of stuff here, from a humble Peugeot 205 to the new Porsche 911 GT3 – even an ex-Michael Schumacher Formula 1 car.
One of the big draws this year is Renault’s stand, where its new electric streamliner, the Filante, is making its first public outing. It’s meant to set a new record for EV efficiency, but there’s more to it than rigorous engineering alone, for it’s rather handsome to boot.
“Everything is simpler, more sleek,” Renault design boss Gilles Vidal explains, suggesting the one-off creation not only had to meet a lofty technical goal but also look good while doing it.
It’s this ethos – the intersection of world-beating engineering and jaw-dropping design – that defines many of the French icons on show.
Take the original Citroën DS as an example. Its famed hydropneumatic suspension played a big role in ensuring that it could challenge the likes of Mercedes-Benz in the luxury saloon market, but it was that unconventional design that captured hearts. So stunning were its proportions – our correspondent in October 1956 wrote that its rear wheels “could hardly be further aft, nor could the seating be more ‘within the wheelbase’” – that it transcended motoring.
Its transition into an art piece was completed in 1959 when Citroën ad man Claude Puech proposed rigging one up with giant balloons in place of wheels to illustrate the DS’s famed ride quality. It’s one of the enduring images of the model and, having been faithfully recreated as Rétromobile’s centrepiece, it draws a big crowd.
The artful touch isn’t restricted to the nation’s road-going machines. Around the corner from the DS is a Matra MS120D grand prix car from 1972, and it’s a stunning work of sculpture. There’s a sense of fluidity from its frontal intake all the way back to its rear spoiler, as if you could trace the flow of air over it by hand.
Down the way is a British-built BRM P160B from the same year – a more competitive racer but nowhere near as pretty, with odd angles and strange protrusions all over the shop.
The rally cars aren’t half bad either: one of Jean Ragnotti’s 1980s Renault 5 Maxi Turbos is tucked away in a back corner, resplendent with not one, not two, but six foglights. It’s unlikely that monsieur really needed that much visibility, so maybe the two snout-like pods on the bonnet’s leading edge were purely an expression of excess, hinting at the Turbo’s stonking performance.
On the subject of France’s beloved Cinq, there’s a furore brewing on the Renault stand. People are swarming the brand new electric model, cooing. “C’est magnifique,” one man says to his family, and his children concur: “C’est magnifique!”
It seems we’re on the verge of a new era of design flair. If it just so happens to draw on the finest and indeed weirdest French machines like those seen at Rétromobile, bring it on.
Is it okay to be pleased that Honda and Nissan have decided not to merge after all?
The two Japanese companies last week decided not to follow through on a proposed deal that was met with a fair degree of surprise when they first announced they were considering it at the end of last year.
Now, after more serious talks, the merger has been officially canned after it turned out that it might not have been quite such a ‘merger of equals’ as Nissan originally thought.
Like a football manager leaving a club ‘by mutual consent’, things would have been a bit more mutual on one side than the other. Nissan, in a weaker place than Honda (having a market capitalisation of £8 billion, compared with £31bn), risked effectively being a Honda subsidiary – a position it couldn’t countenance.
Instead, the two companies have decided to carry on working together on products and technology but remain separate entities.
From a business perspective, I don’t know whether this is a good thing or not. Honestly, I’ve no idea. Would it save loads of money if they shared the same offices and accountants and window cleaners and sandwich providers and so on?
Shrug of shoulders. Will they survive independently in a world increasingly dominated by state-underwritten Chinese EV makers?
Hit me up if you know either way. But what I do know is that I’ve always liked Honda because of the kind of independent thinking that brought us the NSX and a business jet with engines on top of the wings and which won it the Isle of Man TT a gazillion times.
And there’s something quite cool about Nissan’s commitment to its Z cars, plus the 17-year production run of the R35 GT-R (even if you can no longer buy it in most countries and production will have to stop this summer).
We’ve heard plenty of stories about enthusiastic engineering managers persuading their bigger bosses to give a little money here and there so that Nissan sports cars can still make it into production.
In that vein, the GT-R will be back, we’re told, but it might take a moment while Nissan decides whether it should have a combustion engine, electric motors or a combination of the two.
In other words, both companies still have soul and a serious independent spirit about them. And while they are undoubtedly rivals, making cars that compete directly with each other, when they turn their skills to making interesting cars (I grant you that this happens less often than it did), each is wilfully different from the other’s.
Nissan brought us the Qashqai when nobody expected it, and everyone bought one. Honda gave us the E when nobody expected it, and although nobody bought it, it’s got a virtual aquarium inside it and the most wonderful surface finishes.
Imagine trying to pull that off with yet another committee overseeing it. One of the characteristics of being in a big conglomerate – as we see in the Volkswagen Group and Stellantis – is that competing brands end up with cars that underneath are the same as each other’s, and that inevitably means they feel a bit like it on the surface too.
I suppose that’s good for business, allowing a company to make bigger and safer investments, with spending spread across larger sales volumes. Triffic, I’m sure, but I don’t know that, as an enthusiast, I therefore love it that much.
And remaining solo can be dandy too. I’m reminded of the time Suzuki pulled out of an alliance with Volkswagen because it felt its independence was threatened. That was 14 years ago (minus a bit for some legal wranglings), and Suzuki still seems to be doing just fine – and is still making some cool cars that unmistakably are low-cost, low-weight Suzukis, not something else with Suzuki badging.
I like it when a proud independent company thinks ‘stuff it, we’ll do it our way’ and keeps on keeping on with its own ideas and values.
Japanese companies seem to particularly embody it and, for good or ill, I think we’re better off with more rather than less of them. I hope it actually turns out to be better for both.
Next Corsa will get bold 'Vizor' grille and 'Compass' lighting motifNext-gen supermini will usher in new-era design and tech as Vauxhall eyes Mini
Vauxhall’s next-generation Corsa Electric will land in 2026 with a bold new look, dramatically longer range and more upmarket billing.
The new model is due to be one of the first cars to ride on parent company Stellantis’s new STLA Small platform – a replacement for the CMP architecture that underpins today’s car, as well as a host of technically related siblings from brands such as Peugeot and Jeep.
Able to accommodate hybrid powertrains but designed primarily for EVs, this new skateboard architecture has been engineered to underpin cars that range from the A segment to the C-segment, with a primary focus on Europe.
Swapping to this new platform, the seventh-generation Corsa is around 10% larger overall than the car it replaces, according to a source familiar with the new model, and is capable in electric form of travelling much farther on a charge, with a maximum range of 340 miles, up from 246 miles today.
Autocar understands the next Corsa will also be positioned with more of a premium focus while keeping its price range – between £29,000 and £36,000 – broadly in line with today’s car. This is part of a bid to steal sales from rivals such as the Renault 5 and Mini Cooper E, as well as the upcoming Volkswagen ID 2 and Cupra Raval.
The new Corsa will take heavy inspiration from Vauxhall’s radical Experimental coupé concept from 2023, chiefly at the front end, where it will completely forego vents and intakes in favour of a minimalist, smooth treatment that signals its all-electric innards.
In place of a conventional grille, the electric Corsa will feature a slick new interpretation of Vauxhall’s ‘Vizor’ motif. Ultra-slim LED headlights will be joined by a wraparound transparent panel that houses an illuminated badge and the sensors for the supermini’s suite of ADAS functions.
Like the 2023 concept car, the new Corsa will have a prominent vertical crease running along its bonnet and down its visage, forming a cross-shaped ‘compass’ design with the headlights. This motif will be emulated at the rear and is set to become a defining signature of new-era Vauxhall models.
It is understood the British car maker is also looking to tone down its branding for its next generation of cars so the badging is expected to be kept to a minimum.
Meanwhile, flush-fitting door handles will contribute to the more minimalist aesthetic and aid aerodynamic efficiency, while new wheels – to be offered no smaller than 19in – will be designed to channel air as effectively as possible under the car.
The reinvention will be even more eye-catching in the Corsa’s cabin, which, Autocar understands, will be totally overhauled in line with the brand’s repositioning of its smallest model.
The primary objective is to offer functionality and material appeal that cement its new premium billing. Plush recycled textiles will be used extensively throughout the cockpit, it will feature new standard equipment including a panoramic roof and ambient lighting, and there will be a slick new ‘floating’ centre console that frees up space where a transmission tunnel would have been – a benefit of the EV-first STLA platform.
Notably, there will be no conventional driver display. It will be replaced by a standard-fit head-up display interface, as with the latest Mini Cooper.
The Corsa will follow its newer SUV stablemates in adopting a heavily reduced suite of physical buttons and switches. The primary control panel will be that new floating central touchscreen, angled towards the driver for easy on-the-move access in an evolution of the brand’s ‘Pure Panel’ dashboard arrangement.
More details of the next Corsa’s technical make-up will arrive around the start of next year, when Stellantis gives a full debrief about the STLA Small platform. But it has already been confirmed to house batteries of up to 82kWh in capacity and that would seem a likely option for the Corsa, given its top-end 340-mile range.
STLA Small retains 400V charging hardware, like CMP, and that will restrict charging speeds compared with more expensive 800V-equipped cars, but the new Corsa is expected to be able to top up more quickly than today’s car, which maxes out at 100kW.
What remains unclear is whether Vauxhall will keep today’s combustion Corsa on sale in its current form alongside the all-new EV or offer an ICE-powered version of the new-generation car.
While STLA Small can house hybrid systems, the company is unlikely to invest heavily in a new generation of ICE models when UK and EU legislation will force its retirement in a few years, so a heavy visual update of the current Corsa hybrid would seem the more viable option.
Bespoke restomod projects are all the rage today, and this is no great surprise.
Over-familiarity will have led to a weary cynicism in many of us, but equally who among us, given the time and means, wouldn’t love to have a crack at creating our dream car?
To set out with no commercial imperative and draft a grand vision, then obsess over the details such that the end result fitted our wants and needs like a glove? It’s fantasy stuff.
What I hadn’t appreciated until recently was the kind of person you need to be to pull it off to convincing effect, even before you’ve pinned down a team of the calibre required for expert engineering and fabrication – the people who will slowly bring your vision to life.
Most of us would be better served keeping the dream confined to a beer mat and chasing after ready-to-wear options from Ariel or Ferrari.
It makes the 0.0001% of wonder-machines that do become a reality as world-class, from-the-ground-up commissions all the more tantalising. Projects like Thornley Kelham’s recent European RS.
“Hal could walk into the prep shop, look at his car from a distance of 10 feet and tell you the sill line is two millimetres out,” says Simon Thornley, co-founder of what is certainly an elite but under-the-radar British restoration company. “And he’d be right. That was the scary thing.”
Hal Walter is a retired Australian architect who spends half his time in the Alps. This partly explains why his commission took the form of a 911 restomod blending the spirit of a 1973 2.7-litre RS and the more recent 997-generation GT3 RS 4.0, which he also owns (of course he does).
It was an ambitious concept, but Walter is a man for details – every last one of them.
Shortly after Thornley Kelham agreed to take on the project, a near-40-page document arrived: the instruction manual.
When we visited the firm’s premises last year to see and drive the 95%-finished European RS, Thornley produced a printout and dropped it onto a table. It landed with a pronounced slap. “This is about the fourth version,” he said. “We’re now on version 23.”
The level of detail in this tome was exquisite, inspiring, just a little unnerving and perhaps understandable for a man with an architect’s mind and many, many hundreds of thousands of pounds on the line.
Part prescriptive (one can’t help but admire the inclusion of gear ratios), it took more of a manifesto form elsewhere.
The intake needs to wail like this, the chassis balance should feel like that and so on.
The car will weigh such and such in full running order (start with an original 911 T chassis, please, rather than a commonly used 964 one, as it will save us 300kg). There was also the design, both inside and out.
The showstopping aesthetics of the European RS, down to the split-level ducktail, are mostly Walter’s handiwork. It’s hard not to be impressed.
“The guy is a bloody perfectionist. We were painting things to concours standard that you will never see,” said Thornley, who himself had a 2.7-litre RS for decades. He jokes about the hardest part of this mesmerising project being ‘the owner’ and is vindicated when his phone starts buzzing away during our chat. Guess who.
But the truth is that he and business partner Wayne Kelham are as mad about the details as Walter, and this really is a multi-disciplinary business.
It isn’t solely turning out modified old 911s, as shown by the magnificent, fully restored Lamborghini Miura in one of the workshops.
Adjacent to it was a Bugatti Type 40, and an engine-building facility sits across the road where, among other jewels, fettled 300bhp Virgilio V6s are prepped before being dropped into Thornley Kelham’s hot-rod take on Lancia’s B20 GT Aurelia.
The presence of English wheels warms the heart, so too the shell of a Citroën SM. The place is a toy box – one in which any project, no matter how whimsical, can fully materialise.
It was thus well placed to deliver something on the level of the European RS. But listening to Thornley, I still couldn’t help wondering if the reality could live up to the expectation – to the painstaking planning in Walter’s paperwork and his huge emotional investment in the project.
As it happens, when you’re this committed and enlist just the right people, magic unfolds.
The car is a hand-built masterpiece, its delivery of 380bhp from 3.7 litres of flat six feeling utterly open-ended and the integration of 997 GT3-style linkages into a feather-light chassis giving the handling adjustability reminiscent of today’s 992 GT3, only dialled up.
And the details. Good grief, they’re fabulous. I’d love to think I could’ve masterminded such a car, but in truth? Hmm.
Sketch reveals chunky, upright proportions and bold stylingNew sketch reveals bold look for Volkswagen's long-awaited 'ID 1', due in showrooms in 2027
Volkswagen has revealed the styling of the ID Every 1 concept that it will show in full next month, previewing a £17k electric car to succeed the Up.
The new entry-level model, expected to take the ID 1 name in production form, is due to arrive in 2027 with a base price of "about €20,000", said Volkswagen, making it "attractive for a wide variety of user groups".
It is expected to share its underpinnings with the Volkswagen Polo-sized ID 2 (a shortened 'Entry' version of the Volkswagen Group's modular MEB platform), but no technical details have yet been confirmed.
The new sketch released by the company shows the city car will have chunky, upright proportions and a distinctive new visage incorporating Volkswagen's new-look LED lighting signatures.
Volkswagen CEO Thomas Schäfer celebrated the new car's unveiling as a pivotal moment for the company: "An affordable, high-quality and profitable electric Volkswagen from Europe for Europe: that's the Champions League of automotive engineering!”
It isn't yet confirmed whether the ID 1 will be built in Spain by the Volkswagen Group, alongside the ID 2 and its 'ID 2 X' crossover sibling, the Skoda Epiq compact SUV and the more sporting Cupra Raval.
Volkswagen technical development boss Kai Grünitz has previously suggested the new entry model will be an obvious successor to the successful Up city car in its conception, and will share some design elements and attributes.
“The 'ID 1' will be close to the Up regarding the usage of that car," he said. "There aren't so many possibilities to design a small vehicle for cities in terms of what it looks like. It will be a car that fits into the Volkswagen brand design DNA and functionality DNA but at a lower price.”
Grünitz stopped short of categorically confirming the return of the Up badge, but Volkswagen places great value on its longest-running and most successful names. Golf, Passat and Tiguan are all due to be retained in the EV era, with the suggestion that the brand’s numerical naming strategy for its ID EVs could be retired.
Grünitz outlined the importance of bringing such a car to market: “You need a smaller car that’s affordable for the broader customer base. That’s why we’re going for €25,000 for the ID 2all and we're invested in the development phase for a vehicle below €20,000. That’s Volkswagen.
“We have to go in that direction to convince our customers that EV is the right way.
“You need a car that really fits the customer demands in that price class. You don’t need high-end technology within these cars.”
“Maybe you could bring your own device into this car instead of having a huge infotainment system, or something like that,” he added, hinting at the possibility for it to feature a smartphone cradle in place of a touchscreen, like the Up did.
“It has to be tailored to the customer group,” he said, adding that the focus will instead be on making it “bigger inside than outside”, with effective use of space and a range of innovative storage solutions.
Neither will the final car be equipped with 200kW fast-charging capacity or a battery that allows it to travel long distances, because it's envisioned as a pure city car, “not a car for driving thousands of kilometres on the highway”.
The Volkswagen e-Up, retired in 2023 along with the petrol Up as production came to a close in Slovakia, had a claimed range of 161 miles and could charge at a maximum speed of 37kWh.
Asked by Autocar whether the Up’s replacement can be produced profitably, Grünitz suggested that it might not need to generate huge margins in its own right but could rather serve as a ‘loss leader’ by introducing younger users to the Volkswagen EV line-up.
“Should it be a vehicle that is profitable on its own, or should we look for a vehicle that might be for first users? I started with a Polo when I was 18 years old. I got in touch with the VW family, jumped into a Golf and never left the Volkswagen family. It’s really important to have a vehicle for first-car users," said Grünitz.
“There's also the possibility to earn money with more expensive cars,” he said, suggesting that margins from larger cars could be sufficient to support production of a less profitable model.
The #6 will be Smart's slipperiest model yet, offering range figures north of 400 milesNew rakish four-door saloon will be the brand's quickest model ever
Smart’s sleek #6 flagship will be unveiled later this year as the brand’s quickest and most advanced model to date, packing reserves of more than 630bhp in its most potent form.
The rakish four-door saloon will be positioned as a rival to the Tesla Model 3, a car it will have a similar footprint to. It has been designed with a focus on range so will feature the slipperiest body of any Smart model to date.
Autocar has been told this will allow it to offer “well over 800km” (497 miles) of range in its most efficient form, although that figure is based on the generous Chinese CLTC test cycle. On the WLTP cycle used in Europe, it is expected to return a figure close to the Model 3 Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive’s 436 miles.
The saloon, which is twinned with the Zeekr 007, will be shown for the first time in the second half of 2025 before reaching UK showrooms in early 2026.
While predominantly developed as an electric car, the #6 will also be offered with a plug-in hybrid drivetrain as part of a move to fill sales gaps in markets where EVs have yet to take off.
Secrecy still surrounds the styling of the new saloon, which like all of Smart’s current models has been designed by a team at Mercedes-Benz headed by Smart design boss Kai Sieber.
However, Autocar understands that it will adopt a distinctive raked roofline together with detailing and surfacing treatment similar to the #1, #3 and #5. Like those cars, the #6 will also feature frameless doors and wheels that range from 19in to 21in.
Smart’s maiden saloon is based on the Geely-developed PMA2+ platform – a structure derived from the Chinese car maker’s Sustainable Experience Architecture (SEA) for EVs that underpins models such as the Polestar 4.
PMA2+ can use 400V and 800V electric architectures – the latter of which is set to provide the #6 with a charging capability of up to 400kW. As with the #1, #3 and #5, it also forms the basis for both single-motor rear-wheel-drive and dual-motor four-wheel-drive powertrains.
Insiders at Smart’s HQ in China suggest power outputs will be largely in line with those of the #5, with rear-wheel-drive models offering up to 335bhp and four-wheel-drive models boosted to 597bhp.
Heading the #6 range will be a hot Brabus model to challenge the Tesla Model 3 Performance.
Packing four-wheel drive and up to 638bhp, it is expected to deliver 0-62mph in less than 3.5sec and a governed top speed of 124mph.
A choice of batteries will be offered: a 75kWh LFP unit for 400V rear-drive models or a 100kWh NMC pack for 800V rear- and four-wheel-drive models.
It’s hard to believe, but it’s been 15 years since the first One Motorcycle Show was held back in 2010, and 2025 holds a special significance. This year, One combined forces with the AIMExpo to hold an additional event in Las Vegas alongside AIM, providing a unique opportunity to see two completely different sides of the industry.
Started by the one-and-only Thor Drake, The One Show has always been unique in its quest to celebrate weird, rare, custom, classic and unconventional bikes, and we wondered if the event would hit as hard outside the context of Portland. With a list of 43 confirmed builders and countless additional motorcycles on hand, our concerns were quelled and the event expected to draw more than 9,000 attendees daily.…
The American International Motorcycle Expo might not be the first place you’d expect to find us, as the event has a whole lot more to do with what’s on dealer floors than the custom scene. That’s not the whole story though, because besides rubbing elbows with industry partners and parts manufacturers, we also had a host of factory concept bikes and customs to hunt down.
See, the big OEs are well aware that modified bikes bring big attention, and partnerships with reputable builders are one of the most effective ways to drum up excitement for their current offerings. And when you have the backing of corporate bucks, big things are possible.
The AIMExpo isn’t open to the public, just industry members and press, so we flashed our credentials and got to hiking around the Las Vegas Convention Center.…
Motorcycling can be a selfish endeavor—and yet, motorcyclists can be some of the most charitable people around. If you’re one of those motorcyclists, CROIG and Yamaha have a treat for you. This wild Yamaha XSR900 is being given away to raise funds for Waves for Water, a nonprofit that provides clean water to communities that need it.
This is the second time the two parties have teamed up for charity. The project, dubbed ‘Yard Built for Good,’ is the brainchild of David Chang—founder of the immensely popular CROIG (Café Racers of Instagram)—and is supported by Yamaha’s Yard Built custom initiative. The idea is simple; build a killer custom bike, and give it away to one lucky Waves for Water donor.
For this round of Yard Built for Good, the crew took a 2022-model Yamaha XSR900 and turned it into a fully-faired racer.…
Deus ex Machina finesses the Vespa GTS 300, Untitled Motorcycles rescues a beat-up Zero FXS, and Brooklyn’s The Lurkshop goes buck wild on the Suzuki DR650. In motorcycle news, Ducati updates the XDiavel with their V4 Granturismo engine to turn it into a 168-horsepower super cruiser.
Vespa GTS 300 by Deus ex Machina If you haven’t sampled the Vespa GTS 300 yet, you’re missing out. It’s nippy, handles surprisingly well for a scooter with 12” wheels, and looks killer. It doesn’t exactly beg to be customized—but that didn’t stop Deus ex Machina Australia’s Jeremy Tagand from taking a crack at it.
To the uninitiated, Jeremy’s Vespa GTS 300 Super Sport could be mistaken for a factory bike. But that’s its charm.…
Westbound I remember when we pulled in for breakfast in Port Allegany and she came over to greet us. There was an immediate shift in energy. To this point, we were all silently asking ourselves what we’d gotten ourselves into. It had been two days and when we took our helmets off, I could see it on Greg’s face and in Mike’s blank stare. I could hear it in my team’s whispering of doubts back in NH. Here’s what I learned most from traveling 10,000 miles into the American West over 37 days: I didn’t really know what I was doing.
After packing away our sleeping bags, we rolled through an unfamiliar town and found just the spot to shape what I would come to know most about this trip.…
Whether they’re designing luggage or planning picturesque rallies through the European Alps, motorcycles are core to everything that Malle London does. But so is style. So it stands to reason that the vehicles Malle picks for their endeavors are as tasteful as the gear they create.
These two Royal Enfield Continental GT 650s were built as the official support vehicles for the fourth running of the Great Malle Mountain Rally. Ridden by the rally’s support engineers—Malle co-founder Robert Nightingale and deBolex Engineering’s Calum Pryce-Tidd—the bikes were designed to be the last out and last in on the six-day regulation rally.
Starting in Austria and finishing in Monaco, the Great Malle Mountain Rally crosses six countries over 2,000 km [1,243 miles], rising thousands of meters above sea level with more turns and switchbacks than you can count.…
You can often tell when a custom motorcycle has been built merely to gawk at, and when it’s been built to be ridden. This rowdy Harley Sportster flat tracker leaves little room for doubt. Inspired by the iconic Harley XR750, it hits all the right aesthetic notes, with a build spec tailored to daily abuse.
It belongs to Romain Leclerc—a filmmaker based near Toulon on the French Riviera. As a teen, Romain rode BMX with a group of friends who called themselves ‘Les Pirates.’ Years later, the guys graduated from bicycles to motorcycles, riding and customizing them with the same irreverent energy that marked their BMX days.
This Sportster is Romain’s second custom build, not counting the bikes that he uses for racing and track days.…
Before Harley-Davidson unceremoniously shuttered Buell, the all-American marque produced some of the most interesting motorcycles on the market. The late-2000s Buell XB series is a prime example. Combining aggressive streetfighter styling with bold engineering, it featured a Sportster engine with a downdraught intake, a sculpted fuel-in-frame chassis, and perimeter disc brakes.
David Shrader is a bigger Buell fan than most. An aircraft technician by trade, he bought his first Buell (an M2 Cyclone) new in 1999 and has been enamored with the brand since. For the past decade, he’s also run Revision Moto out of Boynton Beach, Florida, specializing in Buell tuning via a wireless interface he calls ‘Buelltooth.’
Now he’s upping the ante by offering a made-to-order Buell custom, dubbed ‘V-Speed.’…
Ever heard the expression “A builder’s house is never finished?” It counts for custom motorcycle builders, too. Even though customization is their bread and butter, many of them ride bikes that are stock—or just partially modified.
That was the status of Nicko Eigert’s 2012-model Moto Guzzi V7 up until recently. The founder of Indonesia’s Smoked Garage bought the V7 about a year ago as his personal daily runner, but it soon became the shop’s workhorse. And even though he had a million ideas of what he wanted to do to it, a steady stream of customer projects kept it on the back burner.
Things changed when the Moto Guzzi, which had been super dependable until then, broke down. With parts on order from Italy and the V7 patiently waiting on the bench, Nicko and his team couldn’t resist making a few tweaks.…
We open this weekend’s proceedings with a neo-retro kit for the Yamaha Ténéré 700, before changing gears and profiling a bulked-up Honda Monkey from Indonesia. The second half of this week’s Speed Read focuses on boutique concept bikes; the all-electric Ichiban, and the turbocharged Langen LS12 Turbo.
Yamaha Ténéré 700 kit by Holy Moly Motorcycles As adventure bikes go, the Yamaha Ténéré 700 isn’t the prettiest—but it’s not the ugliest either. Looks aside, the proper 21-inch front wheel, long-travel suspension, and delightful Yamaha cross-plane twin-cylinder engine will have anyone grinning like a lunatic.
One such beaming beau is Gareth Charlton, a name you might recognize as a London Bike Shed original and Bike EXIF contributor. Gareth keeps a close eye on the custom world—and that eye was recently drawn to a custom Yamaha Ténéré 700 modified by Holy Moly Motorcycles.…
The limited-edition plug-in-hybrid Wrangler trim builds on the 4xe Sahara, adding new tech features and off-road accessories.
Review, Pricing, and Specs
See the new Rivian R1S California Dune Edition from every angle.
See the new Rivian R1T California Dune Edition from every angle.
The first special-edition Rivians wear a tan paint job called California Dune, pack traction boards atop the roof, and feature two-tone interior upholstery.
The EV startup planned to build electric and hydrogen trucks but struggled to deliver enough vehicles to turn any profit, resulting in the Chapter 11 filing.
Last year, McLaren won its first Formula 1 Constructors' Championship since 1998, so it dressed up the Artura and 750S in Papaya Orange to celebrate.
What started as a badass concept is now being reissued for the second time.
Review, Pricing, and Specs
See the Rolls-Royce Spectre Black Badge from every angle.
The ultra-luxurious electric coupe adds performance and visual flair to the heaps of comfort already included.
Review, Pricing, and Specs
Review, Pricing, and Specs
Review, Pricing, and Specs
Review, Pricing, and Specs
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 exterior photos.
A new XRT model adds off-road flavor as part of a mild, but still impactful, mid-cycle refresh.
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 XRT interior photos.
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 interior photos.
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 XRT exterior photos.
Some people at GM want to green-light the seventh-generation Camaro, but people with more power apparently aren't convinced.
Following an uneventful 2025 model year for the XC60, Volvo's most popular SUV just got a modest facelift that brings new styling and updated tech.
Review, Pricing, and Specs
Review, Pricing, and Specs
1988 Pontiac Grand Prix SE exterior and interior photos.
The new GM10-based Grand Prix looks the business, but it needs more than 130 hp.
See the interior of the 2025 Lexus NX Hybrid from every angle.
See the exterior of the 2025 Lexus NX Hybrid from every angle.
See the refreshed Volvo XC60's interior from every angle.
See the refreshed Volvo XC60's exterior from every angle.
Volvo's smallest EV SUV gets the Cross Country treatment, receiving a more rugged appearance and upgraded hardware.
At a Rhode Island concours event, a rock star and a field of outlaw Porsches celebrate a fresh take on the classic sports car.
The 1970s hatchback has been fitted with a modern EV powertrain and a digital instrument cluster to make it feel more current—just don't plan any long trips.
New sedans are disappearing from American roads, but Kia could help change that with the forthcoming four-door EV4.
This rebodied 922-generation Porsche 911 from boutique automaker Rezvani pays tribute to the iconic 935 endurance racer from the 1970s.
2024 Mercedes-AMG GLC43 Coupe exterior photos.
2024 Mercedes-AMG GLC43 Coupe interior photos.
A small turbo four replaces the twin-turbo V-6, but the endearing playfulness remains.
See the BMW Vision Driving Experience concept from every angle.
The Vision Driving Experience hints at the production car's design and houses a "superbrain" called "Heart of Joy" that aims to preserve BMW's driving dynamics.
This tiny hatchback comes with an even tinier scooter that fits in the trunk.
See photos of the 2025 MG4 EV as we tour scenic locales around Scotland.
The formidable late editor from Car and Driver and Automobile Magazine was actually quite disarming in person, but she armed a generation of journalists by her example.
Not everything that'll cross the block is priced out of reach, from a restored MGB GT Special to a '67 Volvo 1800 S.
We tour the show and speak with Lucy Block about Ken Block's influence and the future of the Block racing family.
Back in the day, machines like this ruled the suburbs.
1987 BMW 325i Convertible exterior and interior photos.
This is BMW's first convertible in a very long time, and it was worth the wait.
Jeep has posted images online of the forthcoming Wrangler-like EV, which is slated to arrive sometime later this year.
Not everyone has a garage where they can charge an electric vehicle. Not everyone lives in a place where charging stations are plentiful. If that's you, here are some ways to cope.